Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748682›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2021

The role of reproductive loss on flock performance: a comparison of nine industry flocks.

Paul R Shorten, Sara J Edwards, Jenny L Juengel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic Control of Canalization for Twinning Rates in Polypay and Rambouillet Sheep Using Threshold or Double Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Breeding Ewe Lambs: An Australasian Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul R ShortenAgResearch Limited, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5938-8837
Sara J EdwardsAgResearch Limited, Invermay Research Centre, Puddle Alley, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Jenny L JuengelAgResearch Limited, Invermay Research Centre, Puddle Alley, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Attaining optimal flock performance requires information about how the reproductive steps are linked and relate to readily available measurements of the state of the flock. The goal was to use data from nine commercial flocks (greater than 300,000 records) to investigate and model the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance. We also developed a maximum-likelihood based methodology to predict flock ovulation rate based on measurements of the number of fetuses at mid-pregnancy (detected by ultrasound-scanning). The model was used to determine how changes in premating liveweight, age, predicted ovulation rate, number of fetuses at mid-pregnancy, lamb survival and lamb growth rate affect the total lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram in each flock. The data from the commercial flocks were also used to investigate the role of ewe age and premating liveweight on each reproductive step. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance, with a focus on understanding how these steps vary between flocks. The elasticity for embryo survival was 60% of that for lamb survival for these flocks and the elasticities for ovulation rate were highly variable between flocks (0.16 to 0.50 for mature ewes). This indicates that ovulation rate was near-optimal for some flocks, whereas there was potential to significantly improve flock performance in suboptimal flocks. The elasticity for ewe premating liveweight was highly variable between flocks (-0.03 to 0.84 for mature ewes and -0.18 to 1.39 for ewe lambs), indicating that premating liveweight ranged from optimal to suboptimal between flocks. For these suboptimal farms, the opportunity exists to increase flock performance through improved management of ewe premating liveweight. Reproductive loss was significantly greater in ewe lambs than mature ewes, although the difference is dependent on the stage of reproduction and flock. Predicted ovulation rate was 25% lower for ewe lambs and there was a 30% relative decrease in the predicted embryo survival probability from ovulation to scanning for ewe lambs. There was a 10% relative decrease in lamb survival probability from birth to weaning for ewe lambs and lamb growth rate was 25% lower for ewe lambs.

Indexed as

embryo survivallamb growth ratelamb survivalovulation ratereproductionsheep

Identifiers

PMID33748682
PMCPMC7963042
OpenAlexW3127998770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.