ArticleACS omega2021
Automatic and Reliable Quantification of Tonic Dopamine Concentrations
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrating AI with Biosensors and Voltammetry for Neurotransmitter Detection and Quantification: A Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Neurotransmitter Monitoring by Fast Voltammetry: Current and Future Prospects.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Wideband ratiometric measurement of tonic and phasic dopamine release in the striatum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Resolution of tonic concentrations of highly similar neurotransmitters using voltammetry and deep learning.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Cocaine-Induced Changes in Tonic Dopamine Concentrations Measured Using Multiple-Cyclic Square Wave VoltammetryFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysregulation of the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) is implicated in several neuropsychiatric conditions. Multiple-cyclic square-wave voltammetry (MCSWV) is a state-of-the-art technique for measuring tonic DA levels with high sensitivity (<5 nM), selectivity, and spatiotemporal resolution. Currently, however, analysis of MCSWV data requires manual, qualitative adjustments of analysis parameters, which can inadvertently introduce bias. Here, we demonstrate the development of a computational technique using a statistical model for standardized, unbiased analysis of experimental MCSWV data for unbiased quantification of tonic DA. The oxidation current in the MCSWV signal was predicted to follow a lognormal distribution. The DA-related oxidation signal was inferred to be present in the top 5% of this analytical distribution and was used to predict a tonic DA level. The performance of this technique was compared against the previously used peak-based method on paired
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.