ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2020
Closing the Loop on Exoskeleton Motor Controllers: Benefits of Regression-Based Open-Loop Control.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on Control Strategy of Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robots: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effects of Ankle Exoskeleton Motor Location on Gait Biomechanics and User Perceptions: The Bowden Cable Dilemma.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2025Article
- Sensorless model-based tension control for a cable-driven exosuit.Wearable technologies · 2024Article
- Sensors and Actuation Technologies in Exoskeletons: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower-limb exoskeletons are widely researched to improve walking performance and mobility. Low-level sensor-less exoskeleton motor control is attractive for consumer applications due to reduced device complexity and cost, but complex and variable transmission system configurations make the development of effective open-loop motor controllers that are responsive to user input challenging. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an open-loop motor control framework resulting in similar or greater performance vs. closed-loop torque control. We used generalized linear regression to develop two open-loop controllers by modeling motor current during exoskeleton-assisted walking; a "complex" model used desired torque and estimated ankle angular velocity as inputs, while a "simple" model used desired torque alone. Five participants walked at 1.0-1.3 m/s on a treadmill with closed-loop and both open-loop controllers providing ankle exoskeleton assistance. Both open-loop current controllers had similar root-mean-squared torque tracking error (p=0.23) compared to the closed-loop torque-feedback controller. Both open-loop controllers had improved relative average torque production (p<0.001 complex, p=0.022 simple), lower power consumption (p<0.001 for both), and reduced operating noise (p=0.002 complex, p<0.001 simple) over the closed-loop controller. New control models developed for a different ankle exoskeleton configuration showed similar improvements (lower torque error, greater average and peak torque production, lower power consumption) over closed-loop control during over-ground walking. These results demonstrate that our framework can produce open-loop motor controllers that match closed-loop control performance during exoskeleton operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.