Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748402›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Clinical impact of estimated plasma volume status and its additive effect with the GRACE risk score on in-hospital and long-term mortality for acute myocardial infarction.

Tsutomu Kawai, Daisaku Nakatani, Takahisa Yamada, Yasuhiko Sakata, Shungo Hikoso, Hiroya Mizuno, Shinichiro Suna, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Katsuki Okada, Tomoharu Dohi and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Tsutomu KawaiDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Daisaku NakataniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takahisa YamadaDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhiko SakataDepartment of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shungo HikosoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hiroya MizunoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shinichiro SunaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tomoharu DohiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takayuki KojimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Bolrathanak OeunDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Akihiro SunagaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hirota KidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hiroshi SatoSchool of Human Welfare Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Masatsugu HoriOsaka Prefectural Hospital Organization Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Issei KomuroDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke TamakiDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi MoritaDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masatake FukunamiDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study (OACIS) Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimated plasma volume status (ePVS) is a well-validated prognostic indicator in heart failure. However, it remains unclear whether ePVS has prognostic significance in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Moreover, there is no available information on its additive effect with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score in AMI patients.

methodsData were obtained from the Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study (OACIS) registry database. Patients whose data were available for ePVS derived from Hakim's formula and the GRACE risk score were studied. The primary endpoints were in-hospital and 5-year mortality.

resultsOf 3930 patients, 206 and 200 patients died during hospitalization and 5 years after discharge, respectively. After adjustment, ePVS remained an independent predictor of in-hospital death (OR:1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, p = 0.036), and 5-year mortality(HR:1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p < 0.001). An additive effect of ePVS with the GRACE risk score was observed in predicting the 5-year mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.744 to 0.763 (p = 0.026), but not in-hospital mortality (the AUC changed from 0.875 to 0.875, p = 0.529). The incremental predictive value of combining ePVS and the GRACE risk score for 5-year mortality was significantly improved, as shown by the net reclassification improvement (NRI:0.378, p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI:0.014, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn patients with AMI, ePVS independently predicted in-hospital and long-term mortality. In addition, ePVS had an additive effect with the GRACE risk score on long-term mortality. Therefore, ePVS may be useful for identifying high-risk subjects for intensive treatment.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionPlasma volumePrognosisThe GRACE risk score

Identifiers

PMID33748402
PMCPMC7957089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.