ArticleJPRAS open2021
Incision planning in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
Article in JPRAS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) has evolved dramatically over the last 10 years and has become a speciality in its own right. Usually surgery is carried out by a General Surgeon, sometimes alone and sometimes in combination with a Plastic Surgeon. Patients frequently have multiple incisions over the abdomen, soft tissue excess and skin redundancy and planning the incisions to allow for a comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction can be a challenge.In order to help simplify incision planning we examined our personal series of 150 cases to formulate a classification system for the incision and provide a simple algorithm.
methodsOver an 8 year period from 2007 to 2015, 150 patients underwent complex abdominal wall reconstruction, patient demographics, outcome and complications were recorded. Preoperative photographs of the planned incisions were reviewed by the senior author and classified into 4 groups.
resultsAll patients fell into one of four groups. Type 1, using existing incisions (28%). Type 2, using an abdominoplasty approach (26%). Type 3, a fleur-de-lys approach (43%). Type 4, a free style group where the incisions are so complex that the above three categories are not suitable (3%).
conclusionSoft tissue management in CAWR can be challenging with the primary objective to achieve uncomplicated primary wound healing while optimising the aesthetic outcome. We present a simple classification system and associated algorithm, which can help surgical planning and identify cases that may benefit from a joint procedure with a Plastic Surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.