ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2021
Resection of vaginal recurrence of granulosa cell tumor by pneumovaginal endoscopic surgery.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation Analysis of Serum Pepsinogen, Interleukin, and TNF-Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy and safety study of vNOTES for benign ovarian tumors in obese patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pneumovaginoscopy-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel bidirectional approach for tumor spillage prevention and R0 resection.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Observational
- Fertility-sparing radical resection of juvenile clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix by pneumovaginal endoscopic surgery.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2023Article
- Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for myomectomy: Can it be a conventional surgery?Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Effect of Vaginoscopy versus Conventional Hysteroscopy on Pain, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Endometrial Polyps.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal surgery is a classic and unique gynecologic procedure. However, the operation field is narrow, which may make surgery difficult to perform. While vaginoscopy or vaginal endoscopy could be the solution of choice, they are mainly used for diagnosis due to the lack of adequate equipment to perform complicated surgery (Johary et al., 2015). Laparoscopy, especially single-port surgery, has been introduced in gynecologic surgery, and excellent equipment has been developed to perform complex surgical procedures through narrow inlets. And vaginal endoscopy using such single-port surgery devices, so-called vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), has recently been introduced in the gynecologic field (Li and Hua, 2019 Aug) and allows the easier performance of endoscopic surgery through the vagina for ovarian cystectomy (Baekelandt, 2018 Feb 1), salpingo-oophorectomy (Baekelandt et al., 2018) and hysterectomy (Housmans et al., xxxx) for benign pathology. However, vNOTES has been used mainly as an alternative laparoscopic pathway to reduce abdominal wounds or bypass transabdominal approaches into the abdominal cavity. This report including the surgical video demonstrates the first case, to our knowledge, of successful tumor resection of a rare vaginal recurrence of ovarian granulosa cell tumor (Fujita et al., 2015 May, Levin et al., 2018) by pneumovaginoscopy using single-port surgery devices. A 39-year-old woman with an adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumor had undergone left salpingo-oophorectomy. At 23 years after surgery, a recurrent mass was detected in her left vaginal wall. The patient had no history of pregnancy, and her vagina was too narrow to secure a good field of operation. Therefore, we underwent pneumovaginoscopic surgery. The total operating time was 88 min, and the blood loss volume was minimal. Complete tumor clearance (R0 resection) was achieved microscopically. There were no postoperative complications, and a one-year follow-up revealed no recurrence. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained through our local Ethics Committee of Kansai Medical University (#2019208).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.