Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748284›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2021

Comparison of Multispectral Image-Processing Methods for Brain Tissue Classification in BrainWeb Synthetic Data and Real MR Images.

Hsian-Min Chen, Hung-Chieh Chen, Clayton Chi-Chang Chen, Yung-Chieh Chang, Yi-Ying Wu, Wen-Hsien Chen, Chiu-Chin Sung, Jyh-Wen Chai, San-Kan Lee

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hsian-Min Chen *Center for QUantitative Imaging in Medicine (CQUIM), Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-3237
Hung-Chieh Chen *Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Clayton Chi-Chang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yung-Chieh ChangDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yi-Ying WuDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wen-Hsien ChenDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chiu-Chin SungCenter for QUantitative Imaging in Medicine (CQUIM), Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jyh-Wen ChaiDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-751X
San-Kan LeeDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of brain tissue is a fundamental and challenging task in neuroimaging. Over the past two decades, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and FMRIB's Automated Segmentation Tool (FAST) have been widely used to estimate gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes. However, they cannot reliably estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes. To address this problem, we developed the TRIO algorithm (TRIOA), a new magnetic resonance (MR) multispectral classification method. SPM8, SPM12, FAST, and the TRIOA were evaluated using the BrainWeb database and real magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. In this paper, the MR brain images of 140 healthy volunteers (51.5 ± 15.8 y/o) were obtained using a whole-body 1.5 T MRI system (Aera, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Before classification, several preprocessing steps were performed, including skull stripping and motion and inhomogeneity correction. After extensive experimentation, the TRIOA was shown to be more effective than SPM and FAST. For real data, all test methods revealed that the participants aged 20-83 years exhibited an age-associated decline in GM and WM volume fractions. However, for CSF volume estimation, SPM8-s and SPM12-m both produced different results, which were also different compared with those obtained by FAST and the TRIOA. Furthermore, the TRIOA performed consistently better than both SPM and FAST for GM, WM, and CSF volume estimation. Compared with SPM and FAST, the proposed TRIOA showed more advantages by providing more accurate MR brain tissue classification and volume measurements, specifically in CSF volume estimation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID33748284
PMCPMC7959972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.