Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

A Machine Learning Enhanced Mechanistic Simulation Framework for Functional Deficit Prediction in TBI.

Anna Schroder, Tim Lawrence, Natalie Voets, Daniel Garcia-Gonzalez, Mike Jones, Jose-Maria Peña, Antoine Jerusalem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna SchroderDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tim LawrenceNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Natalie VoetsNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel Garcia-GonzalezDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mike JonesInstitute of Medical Engineering and Medical Physics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jose-Maria PeñaLurtis Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
Antoine JerusalemDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI), and the underlying brain networks identified with it, have recently appeared as a promising avenue for the evaluation of functional deficits without the need for active patient participation. We hypothesize here that such alteration can be inferred from tissue damage within the network. From an engineering perspective, the numerical prediction of tissue mechanical damage following an impact remains computationally expensive. To this end, we propose a numerical framework aimed at predicting resting state network disruption for an arbitrary head impact, as described by the head velocity, location and angle of impact, and impactor shape. The proposed method uses a library of precalculated cases leveraged by a machine learning layer for efficient and quick prediction. The accuracy of the machine learning layer is illustrated with a dummy fall case, where the machine learning prediction is shown to closely match the full simulation results. The resulting framework is finally tested against the rsfMRI data of nine TBI patients scanned within 24 h of injury, for which paramedical information was used to reconstruct

Indexed as

default mode networkfinite element simulationmachine learningresting state functional magnetic resonance imagingtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33748080
PMCPMC7965982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.