Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748070›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2021

Perchloroethylene and Dry Cleaning: It's Time to Move the Industry to Safer Alternatives.

Diana M Ceballos, Katie M Fellows, Ashley E Evans, Patricia A Janulewicz, Eun Gyung Lee, Stephen G Whittaker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana M CeballosDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Katie M FellowsHazardous Waste Management Program in King County, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ashley E EvansHazardous Waste Management Program in King County, Seattle, WA, United States.
Patricia A JanulewiczDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Eun Gyung LeeNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Respiratory Health Division, Field Studies Branch, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Stephen G WhittakerHazardous Waste Management Program in King County, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI JAIME ELIZABETH HART · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Safety and Health Management of Hazards Associated with Emerging Technologies.R25ES023635 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ADAMKIEWICZ, GARY · 2013 to 2019
$1.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R25 ES023635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perchloroethylene (PERC) is the most common solvent used for dry cleaning in the United States. PERC is a reproductive toxicant, neurotoxicant, potential human carcinogen, and a persistent environmental pollutant. The Environmental Protection Agency is evaluating PERC under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (amended TSCA), and has mandated that PERC dry cleaning machines be removed from residential buildings. Some local and state programs are also requiring or facilitating transitions to alternative cleaning technologies. However, the potential for these alternatives to harm human health and the environment is not well-understood. This review describes the issues surrounding the use of PERC and alternative solvents for dry cleaning while highlighting the lessons learned from a local government program that transitioned PERC dry cleaners to the safest current alternative: professional wet cleaning. Implications for future public health research and policy are discussed: (1) we must move away from PERC, (2) any transition must account for the economic instability and cultural aspects of the people who work in the industry, (3) legacy contamination must be addressed even after safer alternatives are adopted, and (4) evaluations of PERC alternatives are needed to determine their implications for the long-term health and sustainability of the people who work in the industry.

Indexed as

TetrachloroethyleneCarcinogensHumansIndustrySolventsCarcinogensSolventsTetrachloroethylenechlorinated solventsdry-cleaninghuman healthPERCprofessional wet cleaningsafer alternatives

Identifiers

PMID33748070
PMCPMC7973082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.