Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747967›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Clinicopathologic Relevance of Claudin 18.2 Expression in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Cristian-Virgil Lungulescu, Daniel Pirici, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Dan Ionut Gheonea, Victor Mihai Sacerdotianu, Ilona Mihaela Liliac, Emil Moraru, Felix Bende, Adrian Saftoiu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bogdan Silviu UngureanuGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Cristian-Virgil LungulescuOncology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Daniel PiriciHistology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Adina Turcu-StiolicaPharmacoeconomics Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Dan Ionut GheoneaGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Victor Mihai SacerdotianuGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Ilona Mihaela LiliacHistology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Emil MoraruSurgical Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Felix BendeGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania.
Adrian SaftoiuGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of tumor markers have been discovered to have potential efficacy as diagnostic and prognostic tools in gastric cancer. We aimed to assess putative correlations between claudin 18.2 expression and pathological or prognosis features in patients with gastric cancer. MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to search for relevant studies from their inception to 30 October 2020. Finally, a total of six articles were included in this meta-analysis. Review Manager 5 software was applied to examine the heterogeneity among the studies and to calculate the odds ratio with 95% CI by selecting corresponding models, in evaluating the strength of the relationship. Publication bias test was also conducted. No bias and no significant correlations were found between CLDN 18.2 and TNM stages, Lauren classification, HER2, grading, or overall survival. This meta-analysis expounded that the relationship with CLDN 18.2 and pathological features depends on the percentage of staining of tumor cells for which CLDN 18.2 is considered positive. Our pooled outcomes suggest that targeted therapy for CLDN 18.2 could be effective if certain criteria were established.

Indexed as

claudin 18.2gastric cancerHER2Lauren classificationTNM stages

Identifiers

PMID33747967
PMCPMC7969651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.