ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021
Functional and genomic characterization of
Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Optical Nanomotion-Based Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Kombucha-Associated Acetic Acid Bacteria andFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Bacterial Cellulose Production by a NovelFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Microbial Valorization of Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Waste into Bacterial Cellulose: Innovations for Circular Bioeconomy Integration.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Controlled Crystallization of Nanocrystalline Apatite via Vapor Diffusion on Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Obtained from Mango Waste.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
- Metagenomic, organoleptic profiling, and nutritional properties of fermented kombucha tea substituted with recycled substrates.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Citrate-buffered Yamanaka medium allows to produce high-yield bacterial nanocellulose in static culture usingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Elevated abundance ofCurrent research in food science · 2024Article
- Bacterial cellulose: recent progress in production and industrial applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Synthesized by ChosenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Better under stress: Improving bacterial cellulose production byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Bacterial Cellulose Properties Fulfilling Requirements for a Biomaterial of Choice in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Sustainability and Influencing Factors in Bacterial Cellulose Production: A Review of the Impact of Microorganisms, Culture Media and Cultivation Methods.Food technology and biotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose is one of the most promising biomaterials for the development of a wide array of novel biotechnological solutions. Nevertheless, the commercial production of bacterial cellulose is still a challenge and obtaining novel strains presenting increased cellulose biosynthesis and stress resistance properties is of extreme importance. This work demonstrates the increased stress resistance, cellulose production abilities, and overall genomic properties of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.