Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747798›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2021

Step-by-step: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a mobile-based intervention for depression among populations affected by adversity in Lebanon.

Eva Heim, Jinane Abi Ramia, Racha Abi Hana, Sebastian Burchert, Kenneth Carswell, Ilja Cornelisz, Pim Cuijpers, Rabih El Chammay, Philip Noun, Chris van Klaveren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Why Did Our Trial Not Work Out? A Qualitative Analysis.Clinical psychology in Europe · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eva HeimDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Jinane Abi RamiaNational Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon.
Racha Abi HanaNational Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sebastian BurchertDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Kenneth CarswellDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ilja CorneliszAmsterdam Center for Learning Analytics, Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rabih El ChammayNational Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon.
Philip NounNational Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chris van KlaverenAmsterdam Center for Learning Analytics, Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Edwina ZoghbiCountry Office for Lebanon, World Health Organization, Beirut, Lebanon.
Edith Van't HofDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-mental health interventions may help to bridge the mental health treatment gap. Evidence on their effectiveness is compelling in high-income countries. Not enough evidence has been generated on their use with communities affected by adversity in low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO), the National Mental Health Programme (NMMP) at Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) in Lebanon and other partners have adapted a WHO intervention called Step-by-Step for use with Lebanese and displaced people living in Lebanon. Step-by-Step is a minimally guided, internet-based intervention for adults with depression. In this study, a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a qualitative process evaluation were conducted to explore the feasibility and the acceptability of the research methods, and the intervention, in preparation for two fully powered trials to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Step-by-Step in Lebanon.

methodParticipants were recruited through social media. Inclusion criteria were: being able to understand and speak Arabic or English; access to an internet connected device; aged over 18; living in Lebanon; scores above cut-off on the Patient Health Questionnaire and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or enhanced care as usual. They completed post-assessments eight weeks after baseline, and follow-up assessments another three months later. Primary outcomes were depression and level of functioning, secondary outcomes were anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and well-being. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the research procedures and the intervention.

resultsA total of

conclusionThe research design, methods and procedures are feasible and acceptable in the context of Lebanon and can be applied in the RCTs. Preliminary findings suggest that Step-by-Step may be effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety and improving functioning and well-being.

Indexed as

DepressionDisplaced peopleFeasibility RCTLow- and middle-income countriesMobile-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID33747798
PMCPMC7967003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.