Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747698›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental sciences Europe2019

Treatment performance comparison between regular O

Kai Yang, Jianwei Yu, Qingyuan Guo, Chunmiao Wang, Ping Xia, Y Jeffrey Yang, Min Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental sciences Europe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai YangKey Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Jianwei YuKey Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Qingyuan GuoKey Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Chunmiao WangKey Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Ping XiaShanghai National Engineering Research Center of Urban Water Resources Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China.
Y Jeffrey YangUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH 45286, USA.
Min YangKey Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences · CNEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve the microbial safety of drinking water, an arrangement of O

resultsThe O

conclusionThe re-location of the sand filter would sacrifice the BAC efficiency in removals of organic matter and micropollutants. This tradeoff is a result of the loss of the particulate organic matter removal by sand filters, because locating the sand filter behind BAC causes particle load increase on BAC; some measures of enhanced coagulation should be suggested to improve the turbidity and particle removal. The study will be helpful for improvement of the O

Indexed as

Drinking water treatmentO3–BAC–sandSand filter interceptionSand–O3–BAC

Identifiers

PMID33747698
PMCPMC7970512
OpenAlexW2962210726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.