Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747684›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Real-Time Polyp Detection, Localization and Segmentation in Colonoscopy Using Deep Learning.

Debesh Jha, Sharib Ali, Nikhil Kumar Tomar, Havard D Johansen, Dag Johansen, Jens Rittscher, Michael A Riegler, Pal Halvorsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07391514 (Deep Learning-Based Intraoperative Dual-tracer Video Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Metastasis Prediction in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07391514 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Deep Learning-Based Intraoperative Dual-tracer Video Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Metastasis Prediction in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled131ConditionsPapillary Thyroid CarcinomaArmsIndocyanine green (ICG) sentinel lymph node mapping, Carbon nanoparticle (CNs) sentinel lymph node mapping, Dual-tracer (ICG combined with CNs) sentinel lymph node mapping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ColonNeXt: Fully Convolutional Attention for Polyp Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Debesh JhaSimulaMet0167OsloNorway.
Sharib AliDepartment of Engineering ScienceBig Data Institute, University of OxfordOxfordOX3 7XFU.K.
Nikhil Kumar TomarSimulaMet0167OsloNorway.
Havard D JohansenDepartment of Computer ScienceUiT-The Arctic University of Norway9037TromsøNorway.
Dag JohansenDepartment of Computer ScienceUiT-The Arctic University of Norway9037TromsøNorway.
Jens RittscherDepartment of Engineering ScienceBig Data Institute, University of OxfordOxfordOX3 7XFU.K.
Michael A RieglerSimulaMet0167OsloNorway.
Pal HalvorsenSimulaMet0167OsloNorway.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided detection, localisation, and segmentation methods can help improve colonoscopy procedures. Even though many methods have been built to tackle automatic detection and segmentation of polyps, benchmarking of state-of-the-art methods still remains an open problem. This is due to the increasing number of researched computer vision methods that can be applied to polyp datasets. Benchmarking of novel methods can provide a direction to the development of automated polyp detection and segmentation tasks. Furthermore, it ensures that the produced results in the community are reproducible and provide a fair comparison of developed methods. In this paper, we benchmark several recent state-of-the-art methods using Kvasir-SEG, an open-access dataset of colonoscopy images for polyp detection, localisation, and segmentation evaluating both method accuracy and speed. Whilst, most methods in literature have competitive performance over accuracy, we show that the proposed ColonSegNet achieved a better trade-off between an average precision of 0.8000 and mean IoU of 0.8100, and the fastest speed of 180 frames per second for the detection and localisation task. Likewise, the proposed ColonSegNet achieved a competitive dice coefficient of 0.8206 and the best average speed of 182.38 frames per second for the segmentation task. Our comprehensive comparison with various state-of-the-art methods reveals the importance of benchmarking the deep learning methods for automated real-time polyp identification and delineations that can potentially transform current clinical practices and minimise miss-detection rates.

Indexed as

benchmarkingcolonoscopyColonSegNetdeep learningdetectionKvasir-SEGlocalisationMedical image segmentationpolyps

Identifiers

PMID33747684
PMCPMC7968127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.