ArticleCureus2021
Assessment of the Clinical Interpreter of Death in Life-Threatening Infective Cases Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit of a North-Eastern State of India.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The clinical factors affecting a patient's condition monitored over time could be useful not only to decide on an intervention that may increase the patients' possibilities of survival but also to predict the treatment outcome. Therefore, this study evaluates the clinical factors as predictors of mortality among severe sepsis patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care center. Method We did a prospective study on over 50 life-threatening infective cases with different causes admitted in the ICU. Clinical and biochemical parameters like temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, bicarbonate levels, blood lactate levels, and pH were monitored at admission, after 24 hours, and after 72 hours. The statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and the Statistical Package for the Social Studies (SPSS) version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). We have obtained ethical clearance from the ethics committee (human) of Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh. Before the collection of the data, we also took informed consent from the participants. Results The mean age of non-survivors was 44.35±11.64 years and that of survivors was 36.60±9.28 years, and the difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.003). An analysis of values of the various vital signs indicated substantial differences in the mean at different time intervals among survivors and non-survivors (p-value <0.05). Among non-survivors, mean temperature, pulse, and rate of respiration were observed to increase over time while blood pressure and oxygen saturation levels were significantly decreasing. Compared to survivors, the mean lactate levels of non-survivors at different time intervals were statistically significant (p-value <0.05). It is also observed that the pH of non-survivors was lower than survivors, and the mean pH value significantly different at different time intervals among the two groups (p-value <0.05). Conclusion The temperature, pulse, rate of respiration, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation levels are essential determinants of patient mortality in those suffering from a severe infection, besides serial lactate levels, bi-carbonate levels, and pH levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.