Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747528›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology report2021

Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (TaLaR trial) protocol.

Liang Kang, Ziwei Zeng, Shuangling Luo, Hong Zhang, Quan Wang, Mingyang Ren, Miao Wu, Weidong Tong, Qing Xu, Yi Xiao and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology report, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A new way to remedy anastomotic leakage after TaTME: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Liang KangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Ziwei ZengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Shuangling LuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Quan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, P. R. China.
Mingyang RenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Miao WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Weidong TongDepartment of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical university, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Qing XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yi XiaoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-1227
Aiwen WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yuan-Guang ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Bo FengRuijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Zhanlong ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Liang HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xingwei ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Minhua ZhengRuijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Jian-Ping WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNPeking University · CNRuijin Hospital · CNChina Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNDaping Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNJilin University · CNNorth Sichuan Medical University · CNSecond People’s Hospital of Yibin · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal mesorectum excision (TME) is considered the standard surgical procedure for rectal-cancer treatment. Transanal TME (taTME) is a new procedure to treat low rectal cancer. Some published studies have proven that taTME can provide a better-quality resected specimen in low-rectal-cancer patients in comparison to the transabdominal procedure, yet long-term outcomes must be investigated. We designed this non-inferiority trial (TaLaR trial) to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between taTME and laparoscopic TME (lapTME) for rectal cancer.

methodsThe TaLaR trial is a phase III open-labeled multicenter randomized-controlled trial. Patients who are diagnosed with rectal cancer with no more than T3N2 stage, and with the tumor location below the peritoneal reflection by magnetic resonance imaging scan, digital rectal examination, or colonoscopy, qualify for this study. After calculating, a total of 1,114 patients (557 per group) will be randomly allocated to either the taTME or the lapTME group. Primary endpoints are the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary endpoints include specimen quality, perioperative results, pelvic and anal function, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The TaLaR trial is expected to clarify whether taTME can achieve comparable oncological outcomes, as well as improve specimen quality and recovery conditions in rectal-cancer patients compared with lapTME.

Indexed as

laparoscopicrectal cancersurgerytotal mesorectal excisiontransanal total mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID33747528
PMCPMC7962745
OpenAlexW3110750454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.