Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747462›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2021

Association of dietary calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D with type 2 diabetes among US adults: National health and nutrition examination survey 2007-2014-A cross-sectional study.

Imran Ullah Shah, Aysha Sameen, Muhammad Faisal Manzoor, Zahoor Ahmed, Jian Gao, Umar Farooq, Sultan Mehmood Siddiqi, Rabia Siddique, Adnan Habib, Changhao Sun and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of Divalent Cations in Infections in Host-Pathogen Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Imran Ullah ShahDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene College of Public Health Harbin Medical University Heilongjiang China.
Aysha SameenFaculty of Food Nutrition and Home Sciences National Institute of Food Science and Technology University of Agriculture Faisalabad Pakistan.
Muhammad Faisal ManzoorSchool of Food and Biological Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-0277
Zahoor AhmedSchool of Food Science and Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China.
Jian GaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene College of Public Health Harbin Medical University Heilongjiang China.
Umar FarooqUniversity Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences The University of Lahore Islamabad Pakistan.
Sultan Mehmood SiddiqiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene College of Public Health Harbin Medical University Heilongjiang China.
Rabia SiddiqueDepartment of Chemistry Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.
Adnan HabibDepartment of Human Nutrition The University of Agriculture Peshawar Peshawar Pakistan.
Changhao SunDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene College of Public Health Harbin Medical University Heilongjiang China.
Azhari SiddeegDepartment of Food Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Gezira Wad Medani Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-1962
Harbin Medical University · CNGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKJiangsu University · CNSouth China University of Technology · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Gezira · SDUniversity of Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher dietary intake of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and vitamin D has been associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and a higher intracellular ratio of Ca to Mg leads to insulin resistance. Previous epidemiological studies did not examine the combined effects of dietary Ca, Mg, and vitamin D as well as ratio of Ca to Mg with T2DM. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between dietary intakes of Mg, Ca, and vitamin D (using 24-hr recalls) individually and in composite and T2DM in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2014, which involved 20,480 adults (9,977 men and 10,503 women) with comprehensive information on related nutrients, and anthropometric, demographic, and biomarker variables using multivariable logistic regression. The results indicated that dietary calcium at Q3 (812 mg/day) was significantly linked with T2DM in women (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.65). Dietary vitamin D at Q3 (5.25 μg/day) significantly reduced the odds of T2DM by 21% in men (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.98). This is an interesting study that has important implications for dietary recommendations. It is concluded that US adults having dietary Ca below the RDA were associated with increased risk of T2DM in all population and women, while higher ratio of Ca to Mg was associated with increased risk of T2DM in all population and increased vitamin D intake is related to decreased risk of T2DM in men. Moreover, further research is needed to make more definitive nutritional recommendations.

Indexed as

cross‐sectional studydietary calciummagnesiumNHANEST2DMvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID33747462
PMCPMC7958525
OpenAlexW3124983345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.