Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747274›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2021

Comparison of clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups.

Serda Duman, İsmet Yalkın Çamurcu, Hanifi Uçpunar, Ahmet Sevencan, Şuayip Akıncı, Vedat Şahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The risk of revision surgery after trainee-led primary total hip replacement.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Serda DumanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Selahaddin Eyyubi State Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
İsmet Yalkın ÇamurcuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey.
Hanifi UçpunarDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey.
Ahmet SevencanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
Şuayip AkıncıDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Vedat ŞahinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Erzincan University · TRYedikule Teaching Hospital · TRDiyarbakır Askeri Hastanesi · TRŞanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNo significant regression has been reported in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates despite substantial progress in implant technologies and surgical techniques. It is critical to investigate how patient demographics, THA indications, surgical techniques, types of implants, and other factors influence the frequency of early and late revision surgery. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe clinical data of 396 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2011 were evaluated in this multi-centre study. Patients were assigned to one of four revision time groups based on the interval between the index hip arthroplasty and the revision surgery (< 2, 2-5, 5-10, and > 10 years).

resultsThere were significant differences among revision time groups in terms of aetiology for primary hip arthroplasty, indications for revision hip arthroplasty, and types of revision procedures. Patients with hip dysplasia more frequently received revision hip arthroplasty within 2 years in contrast to those with osteoarthritis. Revision hip arthroplasties due to periprosthetic infection and instability were conducted earlier compared to aseptic loosening. The overall 10-year survival rate of revision hip arthroplasty was 83.2%, and it was highest for the very early revisions (< 2 years).

conclusionsAccording to our results, early revision hip arthroplasty was found to be mostly dependent on surgery-related factors rather than demographic factors. On the other hand, we observed that survival rates of very early revision hip arthroplasties are higher than late revision hip arthroplasties.

Indexed as

aseptic looseninghip dysplasiainstabilityperiprosthetic infectionrevision

Identifiers

PMID33747274
PMCPMC7959053
OpenAlexW2979364219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.