ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Clinical diagnostic value of combined detection of IMA, D-D and MCP-1 in acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in biomarkers for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Effects of Dapagliflozin in Combination with Metoprolol Sustained-Release Tablets on Prognosis and Cardiac Function in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction after PCI.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Ischemia-Modified Albumin: Origins and Clinical Implications.Disease markers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical value of the combined detection of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), D-dimer (D-D) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Altogether 87 patients with AMI from January 2017 to January 2018 were enrolled in the AMI group, and 82 patients without coronary artery disease were included in the control group. The serum levels of IMA, D-D, MCP-1, cardiac troponin (CTnT) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in the two groups were detected by ELISA. The blood lipids of the two groups and the levels of IMA, D-D, MCP-1 after treatment were detected. The association between IMA, D-D, MCP-1, CTnT, hs-CRP and blood lipid in patients with AMI was analyzed. The values of IMA, D-D, and MCP-1 alone and combined in the diagnosis of AMI were analyzed by ROC curve. The levels of IMA, D-D, MCP-1, CTnT and hs-CRP in the AMI group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of IMA, D-D and MCP-1 in the patients with poor prognosis were significantly higher than those of the good prognosis group (P<0.05). The changes of IMA, D-D and MCP-1 levels were positively correlated with the levels of CTT and hs-CRP (P<0.05). The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of patients with AMI diagnosed with MCP-1 alone were 0.8084, 81.61 and 69.51%, respectively. Those of patients diagnosed by D-D were 0.7302, 59.77 and 81.71%, those of patients diagnosed by IMA alone were 0.7289, 58.62 and 80.49%, and those of patients detected by the combination of MCP-1, D-D and IMA were 0.9047, 58.62 and 93.90%. In conclusion, the levels of IMA, D-D and MCP-1 in AMI patients are higher than those in the control group. The levels of IMA, D-D and MCP-1 were positively correlated with CTnT and hs-CRP levels in AMI patients. Combined detection of IMA, D-D, and MCP-1 can improve the accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.