Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747131›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

Treatment satisfaction in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy under nusinersen therapy.

Alma Osmanovic, Gresa Ranxha, Mareike Kumpe, Claudia D Wurster, Benjamin Stolte, Isabell Cordts, René Günther, Maren Freigang, Lars H Müschen, Camilla Binz and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alma OsmanovicDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, Hannover 30625, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-8423
Gresa RanxhaDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Mareike KumpeDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Claudia D WursterDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Benjamin StolteDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Isabell CordtsDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-1997
René GüntherDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.
Maren FreigangDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.
Lars H MüschenDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Camilla BinzDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas HermannTranslational Neurodegeneration Section 'Albrecht-Kossel,' Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Marcus DeschauerDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Paul LingorDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tim HagenackerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-3450
Olivia Schreiber-KatzDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Susanne PetriDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETUM Klinikum · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversität Ulm · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNusinersen was the first approved disease-modifying therapy for all 5q-spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients regardless of age or disease severity. Its efficacy in adults has recently been demonstrated in a large cohort by motor outcome measures, which were only partially suitable to detect changes in very mildly or severely affected patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) have been suggested as a valuable addition. Here, we aimed to assess treatment satisfaction and investigate whether it may be a useful PRO to monitor SMA patients.

methodsWe enrolled 91 mainly adult 5q-SMA patients treated with nusinersen in a national, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. 21 patients underwent longitudinal follow up. Patients' satisfaction with treatment in four dimensions (global, effectiveness, convenience, side effects) was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication German version 1.4 (TSQM-1.4

resultsMore than 90% of SMA patients were consistently satisfied over a median treatment duration of 10 months. Highest mean scores were observed in the dimensions 'side effects,' 'global satisfaction,' and 'effectiveness' (93.5 ± 14.8

conclusionMost patients were satisfied with nusinersen treatment effectiveness. Less severely affected patients indicated higher satisfaction. The TSQM-1.4

Indexed as

antisense oligonucleotidenusinersenpatient-reported outcome measuresspinal muscular atrophytreatment satisfactionTSQM-1.4©

Identifiers

PMID33747131
PMCPMC7940734
OpenAlexW3133794404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.