Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33747045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

STATegra: Multi-Omics Data Integration - A Conceptual Scheme With a Bioinformatics Pipeline.

Nuria Planell, Vincenzo Lagani, Patricia Sebastian-Leon, Frans van der Kloet, Ewoud Ewing, Nestoras Karathanasis, Arantxa Urdangarin, Imanol Arozarena, Maja Jagodic, Ioannis Tsamardinos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Application of Omics in Donkey Meat Research: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-omics profiling approach in food allergy.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nuria PlanellTranslational Bioinformatics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Vincenzo LaganiInstitute of Chemical Biology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Patricia Sebastian-LeonDepartment of Genomic and Systems Reproductive Medicine, IVI-RMA (Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad - Reproductive Medicine Associates) IVI Foundation, Valencia, Spain.
Frans van der KloetSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ewoud EwingDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nestoras KarathanasisInstitute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.
Arantxa UrdangarinTranslational Bioinformatics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Imanol ArozarenaCancer Signalling Unit, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Health Research Institute of Navarre (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Maja JagodicDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ioannis TsamardinosGnosis Data Analysis P.C., Heraklion, Greece.
Sonia TarazonaDepartment of Applied Statistics, Operations Research and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Ana ConesaMicrobiology and Cell Science, Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jesper TegnerBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
David Gomez-CabreroTranslational Bioinformatics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technologies for profiling samples using different omics platforms have been at the forefront since the human genome project. Large-scale multi-omics data hold the promise of deciphering different regulatory layers. Yet, while there is a myriad of bioinformatics tools, each multi-omics analysis appears to start from scratch with an arbitrary decision over which tools to use and how to combine them. Therefore, it is an unmet need to conceptualize how to integrate such data and implement and validate pipelines in different cases. We have designed a conceptual framework (STATegra), aiming it to be as generic as possible for multi-omics analysis, combining available multi-omic anlaysis tools (machine learning component analysis, non-parametric data combination, and a multi-omics exploratory analysis) in a step-wise manner. While in several studies, we have previously combined those integrative tools, here, we provide a systematic description of the STATegra framework and its validation using two The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) case studies. For both, the Glioblastoma and the Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) cases, we demonstrate an enhanced capacity of the framework (and beyond the individual tools) to identify features and pathways compared to single-omics analysis. Such an integrative multi-omics analysis framework for identifying features and components facilitates the discovery of new biology. Finally, we provide several options for applying the STATegra framework when parametric assumptions are fulfilled and for the case when not all the samples are profiled for all omics. The STATegra framework is built using several tools, which are being integrated step-by-step as OpenSource in the STATeg

Indexed as

component analysisdata-integrationGeneSetClustermulti-omic analysesnext-generation sequencingnon-parametric combination

Identifiers

PMID33747045
PMCPMC7970106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.