ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Neural Coding in Spiking Neural Networks: A Comparative Study for Robust Neuromorphic Systems.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Compact and Fast Single-Spike TTFS Encoder With Ultralow Operating Voltage for Efficient Neuromorphic Fourier Transform.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Weaving Intelligence: Thermally Drawn Multimaterial Fibers Toward AI-Enabled Smart Textiles.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Spiking neurons as predictive controllers of linear systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Compute-in-memory implementation of state space models for event sequence processing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A compressed sensing neuromorphic processor for sparse signal classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Spark: modular spiking neural networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Three-factor learning in spiking neural networks: An overview of methods and trends from a machine learning perspective.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Neuromorphic computing paradigms enhance robustness through spiking neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent advances in spike-based neural coding for tactile perception.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
- Article
- Optoelectronic Devices for In-Sensor Computing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Residual Stresses and Micro-voids Propel Metal Diffusion for Filament-Based Memristors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Topology optimization of random memristors for input-aware dynamic SNN.Science advances · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Efficient and real-time perception: a survey on end-to-end event-based object detection in autonomous driving.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Review
- Synaptic facilitation and learning of multiplexed neural signals.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
- Engineered biological neuronal networks as basic logic operators.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic-enabled video-activated cell sorting.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A stochastic encoder using point defects in two-dimensional materials.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Spiking neural networks for physiological and speech signals: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various hypotheses of information representation in brain, referred to as neural codes, have been proposed to explain the information transmission between neurons. Neural coding plays an essential role in enabling the brain-inspired spiking neural networks (SNNs) to perform different tasks. To search for the best coding scheme, we performed an extensive comparative study on the impact and performance of four important neural coding schemes, namely, rate coding, time-to-first spike (TTFS) coding, phase coding, and burst coding. The comparative study was carried out using a biological 2-layer SNN trained with an unsupervised spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) algorithm. Various aspects of network performance were considered, including classification accuracy, processing latency, synaptic operations (SOPs), hardware implementation, network compression efficacy, input and synaptic noise resilience, and synaptic fault tolerance. The classification tasks on Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) and Fashion-MNIST datasets were applied in our study. For hardware implementation, area and power consumption were estimated for these coding schemes, and the network compression efficacy was analyzed using pruning and quantization techniques. Different types of input noise and noise variations in the datasets were considered and applied. Furthermore, the robustness of each coding scheme to the non-ideality-induced synaptic noise and fault in analog neuromorphic systems was studied and compared. Our results show that TTFS coding is the best choice in achieving the highest computational performance with very low hardware implementation overhead. TTFS coding requires 4x/7.5x lower processing latency and 3.5x/6.5x fewer SOPs than rate coding during the training/inference process. Phase coding is the most resilient scheme to input noise. Burst coding offers the highest network compression efficacy and the best overall robustness to hardware non-idealities for both training and inference processes. The study presented in this paper reveals the design space created by the choice of each coding scheme, allowing designers to frame each scheme in terms of its strength and weakness given a designs' constraints and considerations in neuromorphic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.