Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33746652›Full record

ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

A Preliminary Study of Personalized Head CT Scan in Pediatric Patients.

Bian Bingyang, Wang Gang, Shao Zhiqing, Nan Li, BoXu Zhou, ShuJia Xu, Dan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bian BingyangJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-1698
Wang GangThird Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-898X
Shao ZhiqingJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.
Nan LiJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.
BoXu ZhouJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.
ShuJia XuJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.
Dan LiJilin University First Hospital, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-0242
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the present study, we introduced a practical approach to quantify organ-specific radiation doses and investigated whether low-dose head circumference (HC)-based protocols for non-enhanced head computed tomography (CT) could reduce organs-specific radiation dose in pediatric patients while maintaining high image quality.

methodsA total of 83 pediatric patients were prospectively recruited. Without limits to the HC, 15 patients were selected as a convention group (CON group) and underwent non-enhanced head CT scan with standard-dose protocols (tube current-time products of 250mAs). Low-dose group (LD group), including remaining 68 pediatrics were divided into 3 subgroups based on the HC: 54.1-57.0 cm for LD

resultsIn CON

conclusionOur research indicated that low-dose HC-based protocols of non-enhanced head CT scan can evidently reduce the organ-specific radiation doses, while maintaining high image quality. HC can serve as a vital tool to guide personalized low-dose head CT scan for pediatric patients.

Indexed as

head circumferencelow-doseMonte Carlo simulationnon-enhanced head computed tomographypediatricradiation dose of organs-specificstandard-dose

Identifiers

PMID33746652
PMCPMC7940743
OpenAlexW3133668646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.