ReviewMolecular imaging2021
Advances in Quantitative Analysis of
Review in Molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Association Between Coronary Artery Calcification, Plaque Vulnerability, and Perivascular Inflammation via Coronary CT Angiography.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-quantified body composition from positron emission tomography/computed tomography and cardiovascular outcomes: a multicentre study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Macrophage-based pathogenesis and theranostics of vulnerable plaques.Theranostics · 2025Review
- AI-derived epicardial fat measurements improve cardiovascular risk prediction from myocardial perfusion imaging.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Advances in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Activity with PET/CT and CTA.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- NaF-PET Imaging of Atherosclerosis Burden.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Advanced targeted nanomedicines for vulnerable atherosclerosis plaque imaging and their potential clinical implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.