Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33746555›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)2021

Deliberating Performance Targets: Follow-on workshop discussing PM

R M Duvall, G S W Hagler, A L Clements, K Benedict, K Barkjohn, V Kilaru, T Hanley, N Watkins, A Kaufman, A Kamal and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Six PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

R M DuvallU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
G S W HaglerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
A L ClementsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
K BenedictU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
K BarkjohnOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
V KilaruU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
T HanleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
N WatkinsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
A KaufmanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
A KamalU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
S ReeceFormer Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
P FransioliClark County Department of Air Quality, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
M GerbolesEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
G GillermanNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Standards Coordination Office, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
R HabreUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
M HanniganUniversity of Colorado-Boulder, Mechanical Engineering Department, Boulder, CO, USA.
Z NingHong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
V PapapostolouSouth Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, USA.
R PopeMaricopa County Air Quality Department, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
P J E QuintanaSan Diego State University, School of Public Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Lam SnyderSacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBay Area Air Quality Management District · USClark County School District · USHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKJoint Research Centre · ITMaricopa County Department of Public Health · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

EPA EP-W-17-011Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of air sensor technology is increasing worldwide for a variety of applications, however, with significant variability in data quality. The United States Environmental Protection Agency held a workshop in July 2019 to deliberate possible performance targets for air sensors measuring particles with aerodynamic diameters of 10 μm or less (PM

Indexed as

Air sensorsCONO2Performance targetsPM10SO2

Identifiers

PMID33746555
PMCPMC7970457
OpenAlexW3110629498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.