ArticleIEEE signal processing magazine2020
Computational MRI with Physics-based Constraints: Application to Multi-contrast and Quantitative Imaging.
Article in IEEE signal processing magazine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Myelin water imaging from accelerated 3D-GRASE acquisitions using subspace constrained reconstruction.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Compressed sensing acceleration of radial 3-D alternating Look-LockerMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- A critical assessment of artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging of cancer.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Manifold Regularizer for High-Resolution fMRI Joint Reconstruction and Dynamic Quantification.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Fast Compressed Sensing of 3D Radial TJournal of imaging · 2023Article
- A Fetal Brain magnetic resonance Acquisition Numerical phantom (FaBiAN).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dual-excitation flip-angle simultaneous cine and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compressed sensing takes advantage of low-dimensional signal structure to reduce sampling requirements far below the Nyquist rate. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this often takes the form of sparsity through wavelet transform, finite differences, and low rank extensions. Though powerful, these image priors are phenomenological in nature and do not account for the mechanism behind the image formation. On the other hand, MRI signal dynamics are governed by physical laws, which can be explicitly modeled and used as priors for reconstruction. These explicit and implicit signal priors can be synergistically combined in an inverse problem framework to recover sharp, multi-contrast images from highly accelerated scans. Furthermore, the physics-based constraints provide a recipe for recovering quantitative, bio-physical parameters from the data. This article introduces physics-based modeling constraints in MRI and shows how they can be used in conjunction with compressed sensing for image reconstruction and quantitative imaging. We describe model-based quantitative MRI, as well as its linear subspace approximation. We also discuss approaches to selecting user-controllable scan parameters given knowledge of the physical model. We present several MRI applications that take advantage of this framework for the purpose of multi-contrast imaging and quantitative mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.