ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2017
A Non-Human Primate Brain-Computer Typing Interface.
Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface.eLife · 2017Trial
- Decoding Handwriting Trajectories from Intracortical Brain Signals for Brain-to-Text Communication.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Differential motor neuron activity in rats during successful and failed grasping.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Neuronal functional connectivity is impaired in a layer dependent manner near chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes in C57BL6 wildtype mice.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Time-varying generalized linear models: characterizing and decoding neuronal dynamics in higher visual areas.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Review
- Neural Decoding for Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Review
- Article
- An artificial intelligence that increases simulated brain-computer interface performance.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Brain-machine interface cursor position only weakly affects monkey and human motor cortical activity in the absence of arm movements.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Augmenting intracortical brain-machine interface with neurally driven error detectors.Journal of neural engineering · 2017Article
- Enhancing Nervous System Recovery through Neurobiologics, Neural Interface Training, and Neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) record brain activity and translate the information into useful control signals. They can be used to restore function to people with paralysis by controlling end effectors such as computer cursors and robotic limbs. Communication neural prostheses are BCIs that control user interfaces on computers or mobile devices. Here we demonstrate a communication prosthesis by simulating a typing task with two rhesus macaques implanted with electrode arrays. The monkeys used two of the highest known performing BCI decoders to type out words and sentences when prompted one symbol/letter at a time. On average, Monkeys J and L achieved typing rates of 10.0 and 7.2 words per minute (wpm), respectively, copying text from a newspaper article using a velocity-only two dimensional BCI decoder with dwell-based symbol selection. With a BCI decoder that also featured a discrete click for key selection, typing rates increased to 12.0 and 7.8 wpm. These represent the highest known achieved communication rates using a BCI. We then quantified the relationship between bitrate and typing rate and found it approximately linear: typing rate in wpm is nearly three times bitrate in bits per second. We also compared the metrics of achieved bitrate and information transfer rate and discuss their applicability to real-world typing scenarios. Although this study cannot model the impact of cognitive load of word and sentence planning, the findings here demonstrate the feasibility of BCIs to serve as communication interfaces and represent an upper bound on the expected achieved typing rate for a given BCI throughput.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.