Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33746219›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2021

Flexible transoral robotic surgery: the Italian experience.

Francesco Barbara, Francesco Cariti, Valentina De Robertis, Michele Barbara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transoral laser exoscopic surgery of the larynx: state of the art and comparison with traditional transoral laser microsurgery.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Article
  2. Transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer. A review of oncological and functional outcomes compared to open surgery.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesco BarbaraOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Unit, Ospedale "Mons. Dimiccoli", Barletta (BAT), Italy.
Francesco CaritiOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Unit, Ospedale "Mons. Dimiccoli", Barletta (BAT), Italy.
Valentina De RobertisOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Unit, Ospedale "Mons. Dimiccoli", Barletta (BAT), Italy.
Michele BarbaraOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Unit, Ospedale "Mons. Dimiccoli", Barletta (BAT), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis prospective, non-randomised study documents our initial experience using the Flex

methodsAll patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotics

resultsAll procedures were successfully completed. There were no intraoperative or serious postoperative complications, with no cases of intraoperative haemorrhage.

conclusionsThis is the first study in Italy evaluating the use of the Flex

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEquipment DesignHumansItalyMiddle AgedMouthProspective Studiesflexible endoscopelarynxpharynxtransoral surgery

Identifiers

PMID33746219
PMCPMC7982750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.