Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33745954›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2021

Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.

Kathryn P Derose, Deshira D Wallace, Bing Han, Deborah A Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigation of Epistemic Equity in Urban Green Space and Mental Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Risk Minimization Approach to Messaging Intervention for Physical Activity.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tourism as a Tool in Nature-Based Mental Health: Progress and Prospects Post-Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. The Effects of Park Based Interventions on Health: The Italian Project "Moving Parks".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn P DeroseRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States. Electronic address: derose@rand.org.
Deshira D WallaceCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States. Electronic address: ddwallac@live.unc.edu.
Bing HanRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States. Electronic address: bhan@rand.org.
Deborah A CohenRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States. Electronic address: dcohen@rand.org.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Linking Churches with Parks to Increase Physical Activity Among LatinosR01CA218188 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI DEROSE, KATHRYN PITKIN · 2018 to 2023
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing use of parks for physical activity has been proposed for improving population health, including mental health. Interventions that aim to increase park use and park-based physical activity include place-based interventions (e.g., park renovations) and person-based interventions (e.g., park-based walking or exercise classes). Using adapted methods from the Community Guide, a systematic review (search period through September 2019) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of park-based interventions among adults. The primary outcomes of interest were health-related, including physical and mental health and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Twenty-seven studies that met review criteria were analyzed in 2019 and 2020. Seven person-based studies included generally small samples of specific populations and interventions involved mostly exercise programming in parks; all but one had an average quality rating as "high" and all had at least one statistically significant outcome. Of the 20 place-based interventions, 7 involved only 1 or 2 parks; however, 7 involved from 9 to 78 parks. Types of interventions were predominantly park renovations; only 5 involved park-based exercise programming. Most of the renovations were associated with increased park-level use and physical activity, however among those implementing programming, park-level effects were more modest. Less than half of the place-based intervention studies had an average quality rating of "high." The study of parks as sites for physical activity interventions is nascent. Hybrid methods that combine placed-based evaluations and cohort studies could inform how to best optimize policy, programming, design and management to promote health and well-being.

Indexed as

Health PromotionParks, RecreationalAdultEnvironment DesignExerciseHumansMental HealthRecreationResidence CharacteristicsWalkingHealth outcomesInterventionsParksPhysical activitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33745954
PMCPMC8096710
OpenAlexW3137600956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.