Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33745360›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

Remifentanil provides an increased proportion of time under light sedation than fentanyl when combined with dexmedetomidine for mechanical ventilation.

Yoshitaka Aoki, Takuya Niwa, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Soichiro Mimuro, Matsuyuki Doi, Yoshiki Nakajima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshitaka AokiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-4160
Takuya NiwaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuki ShikoBiostatistics Section, Clinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-9343
Yohei KawasakiFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichiro MimuroDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Matsuyuki DoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshiki NakajimaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPChiba University Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross College of Nursing · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects of remifentanil versus fentanyl during light sedation with dexmedetomidine in adults receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we compared the use of remifentanil versus fentanyl in adults receiving MV with dexmedetomidine sedation. The primary outcome was the proportion of time under light sedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score between -1 and 0) during MV.

resultsWe included 94 patients and classified 58 into the remifentanil group and 36 into the fentanyl group. The mean proportion of time under light sedation during MV was 66.6% ± 18.5% in the remifentanil group and 39.9% ± 27.3% in the fentanyl group. In the multivariate analysis with control for confounding factors, patients in the remifentanil group showed a significantly higher proportion of time under light sedation than patients in the fentanyl group (mean difference: 24.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval: 12.9-35.8).

conclusionsRemifentanil use might increase the proportion of time under light sedation in patients receiving MV compared with fentanyl administration.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidinePropofolAdultFentanylHumansHypnotics and SedativesPiperidinesRemifentanilRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesDexmedetomidineFentanylHypnotics and SedativesPiperidinesPropofolRemifentanildexmedetomidinefentanylLight sedationmechanical ventilationopioidremifentanil

Identifiers

PMID33745360
PMCPMC7989131
OpenAlexW3136763754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.