Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33745340›Full record

ReviewCartilage2021

Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures.

Betina B Hinckel, Dimitri Thomas, Evan E Vellios, Kyle John Hancock, Jacob G Calcei, Seth L Sherman, Claire D Eliasberg, Tiago L Fernandes, Jack Farr, Christian Lattermann and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Functional Outcomes of Nuts-in-Jelly Mosaicplasty.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Betina B HinckelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Taylor, MI, USA.
Dimitri ThomasUNC Orthopedics and Sports Medicine at Lenoir, Kinston, NC, USA.
Evan E VelliosSports Medicine and Shoulder Surgeon Southern California Orthopedic Institute (SCOI), Van Nuys, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-3934
Kyle John HancockDesert Orthopaedic Center, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Jacob G CalceiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-1046
Seth L ShermanDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Claire D EliasbergHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Tiago L FernandesUniversity of São Paulo, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sports Medicine-FIFA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-3608
Jack FarrOrthoIndy Knee Preservation and Cartilage Restoration Center, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christian LattermannDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andreas H GomollHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USBeaumont Hospital, Troy · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDesert Springs Hospital · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USLenoir Community College · USSouthern California Orthopedic Institute · USStanford University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo create a treatment algorithm for focal grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects of the knee using both classic and novel cartilage restoration techniques.

designA comprehensive review of the literature was performed highlighting classic as well as novel cartilage restoration techniques supported by clinical and/or basic science research and currently being employed by orthopedic surgeons.

resultsThere is a high level of evidence to support the treatment of small to medium size lesions (<2-4 cm

conclusionsNumerous techniques exist for the orthopedic surgeon treating focal cartilage defects of the knee. Treatment strategies should be based on lesion size, lesion location, subchondral bone involvement, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesAlgorithmsChondrocytesHumansKnee Jointarticular cartilagecartilage repaircartilage transplantation

Identifiers

PMID33745340
PMCPMC8808924
OpenAlexW3139020909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.