Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33745089›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2021

Prior context influences motor brain areas in an auditory oddball task and prefrontal cortex multitasking modelling.

Carlos A Mugruza-Vassallo, Douglas D Potter, Stamatina Tsiora, Jennifer A Macfarlane, Adele Maxwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MCGNetBrain informatics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos A Mugruza-VassalloGrupo de Investigación de Computación Y Neurociencia Cognitiva, Facultad de Ingeniería Y Gestión, Universidad Nacional Tecnológica de Lima Sur - UNTELS, Lima, Perú. cmugruza@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-7198
Douglas D PotterNeuroscience and Development Group, Arts and Science, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Stamatina TsioraSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Jennifer A MacfarlaneNHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Adele MaxwellNeuroscience and Development Group, Arts and Science, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

SINAPSE 2009-14UNTELS 229-2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the relationship of orienting of attention, motor control and the Stimulus- (SDN) and Goal-Driven Networks (GDN) was explored through an innovative method for fMRI analysis considering all voxels in four experimental conditions: standard target (Goal; G), novel (N), neutral (Z) and noisy target (NG). First, average reaction times (RTs) for each condition were calculated. In the second-level analysis, 'distracted' participants, as indicated by slower RTs, evoked brain activations and differences in both hemispheres' neural networks for selective attention, while the participants, as a whole, demonstrated mainly left cortical and subcortical activations. A context analysis was run in the behaviourally distracted participant group contrasting the trials immediately prior to the G trials, namely one of the Z, N or NG conditions, i.e. Z.G, N.G, NG.G. Results showed different prefrontal activations dependent on prior context in the auditory modality, recruiting between 1 to 10 prefrontal areas. The higher the motor response and influence of the previous novel stimulus, the more prefrontal areas were engaged, which extends the findings of hierarchical studies of prefrontal control of attention and better explains how auditory processing interferes with movement. Also, the current study addressed how subcortical loops and models of previous motor response affected the signal processing of the novel stimulus, when this was presented laterally or simultaneously with the target. This multitasking model could enhance our understanding on how an auditory stimulus is affecting motor responses in a way that is self-induced, by taking into account prior context, as demonstrated in the standard condition and as supported by Pulvinar activations complementing visual findings. Moreover, current BCI works address some multimodal stimulus-driven systems.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitive modellingCue–target onset asynchrony (CTOA)Electroencephalography (EEG)Event-related potential (ERP)Executive functionFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Motor networksMultitask applicationsOrienting of attentionPrefrontal cortex (PFC)Running average reaction times

Identifiers

PMID33745089
PMCPMC7982371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.