Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33745062›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2022

A Preliminary Comparison on Faecal Microbiomes of Free-Ranging Large Baleen (Balaenoptera musculus, B. physalus, B. borealis) and Toothed (Physeter macrocephalus) Whales.

Stefanie P Glaeser, Liliana M R Silva, Rui Prieto, Mónica A Silva, Angel Franco, Peter Kämpfer, Carlos Hermosilla, Anja Taubert, Tobias Eisenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic diversity of single-celled microorganismCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie P GlaeserInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, IFZ-Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Stefanie.Glaeser@umwelt.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-6195
Liliana M R SilvaInstitute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-9983
Rui PrietoInstitute of Marine Research (IMAR) and Okeanos R&D Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-2572
Mónica A SilvaInstitute of Marine Research (IMAR) and Okeanos R&D Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-309X
Angel FrancoInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, IFZ-Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-7569
Peter KämpferInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, IFZ-Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Carlos HermosillaInstitute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-8492
Anja TaubertInstitute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Tobias EisenbergDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Hessian State Laboratory (LHL), Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversidade dos Açores · PTHessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large baleen and toothed whales play crucial ecological roles in oceans; nonetheless, very little is known about their intestinal microbiomes. Based on striking differences in natural history and thus in feeding behaviours, it can be expected that intestinal microbiomes of large baleen whales and toothed whales are different. To test this hypothesis, the phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiomes was investigated by a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence-based approach for Bacteria and Archaea. Faecal samples from free-ranging large whales collected off the Azores Archipelago (Portugal) were used, comprising 13 individual baleen whales (one sei, two blue and ten fin whales) and four sperm whales. The phylogenetic composition of the Bacteria faecal microbiomes of baleen and toothed whales showed no significant differences at the phylum level. However, significant differences were detected at the family and genus levels. Most abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes and Spirochaeta. Few highly abundant bacterial genera were identified as key taxa with a high contribution to differences among baleen and toothed whales microbiomes. Only few archaeal sequences were detected, primarily Methanomassiliicoccales representing potential methanogenic Archaea. This is the first study that directly compares the faecal bacterial and archaeal microbiomes of free-ranging baleen and toothed whales which represent the two parvorders of Cetacea which members are fully aquatic large mammals which were evolutionary split millions of years ago.

Indexed as

BalaenopteraMicrobiotaAnimalsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSperm WhaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBalaenopteraFaecal microbiomeLarge whalesPhyseter

Identifiers

PMID33745062
PMCPMC8881428
OpenAlexW3138899383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.