ReviewPsychological research2022
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.
Review in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Spatial structure triggers systematic foraging: Segmenting search displays leads to searching by segments.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Target switching in 2D and 3D visual foraging reveals trade-offs between mental effort, travelling distance and movement speed.PloS one · 2026Article
- Understanding human visual foraging: a review.Biological cybernetics · 2025Review
- Easy does it: Selection during interactive search tasks is biased towards objects that can be examined easily.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Charting the Unknown : Sex Differences in Spatial Exploration Across the Lifespan.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- One factor to bind them all: visual foraging organization to predict patch leaving behavior with ROC curves.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- The impact of distribution properties on sampling behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.eLife · 2024Article
- Grocery Shopping Under Simplified Marginal Value Theorem Predictions.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Exploration-exploitation model of moth-inspired olfactory navigation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- Smart active particles learn and transcend bacterial foraging strategies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The time course of visual foraging in the lifespan: Spatial scanning, organization search, and target processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Using Gaze for Behavioural Biometrics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Visual search (VS) is a fundamental task in daily life widely studied for over half a century. A variant of the classic paradigm-searching one target among distractors-requires the observer to look for several (undetermined) instances of a target (so-called foraging) or several targets that may appear an undefined number of times (recently named as hybrid foraging). In these searches, besides looking for targets, the observer must decide how much time is needed to exploit the area, and when to quit the search to eventually explore new search options. In fact, visual foraging is a very common search task in the real world, probably involving additional cognitive functions than typical VS. It has been widely studied in natural animal environments, for which several mathematical models have been proposed, and just recently applied to humans: Lévy processes, composite and area-restricted search models, marginal value theorem, and Bayesian learning (among others). We conducted a systematic search in the literature to understand those mathematical models and study its applicability in human visual foraging. The review suggests that these models might be the first step, but they seem to be limited to fully comprehend foraging in visual search. There are essential variables involving human visual foraging still to be established and understood. Indeed, a jointly theoretical interpretation based on the different models reviewed could better account for its understanding. In addition, some other relevant variables, such as certain individual differences or time perception might be crucial to understanding visual foraging in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.