ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Threshold effects of capital investments on carbon emissions in G20 economies.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capital Formation, Green Innovation, Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Quality: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Heterogeneous analysis of pollution abatement via renewable and non-renewable energy: lessons from investment in G20 nations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental quality in G-7 countries: the conditional role of technological progress.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investment in capitals is sacrosanct to launch a country to a greater path of sustainable development. Notwithstanding, its deleterious impacts on environment are equally incontestable. In light of this stark reality, this paper examines the threshold effects of capital investments on carbon emissions in G20 economies over the period, 1992-2014, for which data are available. The study uses both exogenously determined and endogenously determined thresholds to uncover the relationship. While the former relies on median approach to determining the threshold on the one hand, the latter uses both the fixed effects panel threshold model proposed by (Hansen J Econ 93:345-368, 1999) and the bootstrap method by (Hansen Econometrica 68:575-603, 2000) to assess the statistical relevance of the threshold effects on the other hand. The results of the exogenously determined thresholds show higher statistical significant environmental impacts of capital investments at a median threshold of above 3.068 than when it is lesser. The findings of the latter approach indicate the relationship between capital investments and carbon emissions to be non-linear for the G20 countries. More specifically, this study establishes a single-threshold level of capital investment on carbon emissions for the group of countries. The threshold estimator of 3.434 is established at the 95% confidence interval. Beyond this point, the environmental impacts of capital investments are imaginable. On the policy front, keeping to the limit set by threshold effects would go a long way to stemming environmental pollution and mitigating climatic change impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33745025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.