Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744990›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

An A.I. classifier derived from 4D radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI data: potential to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies.

Nina Pötsch, Matthias Dietzel, Panagiotis Kapetas, Paola Clauser, Katja Pinker, Stephan Ellmann, Michael Uder, Thomas Helbich, Pascal A T Baltzer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina PötschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias DietzelInstitute of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Panagiotis KapetasDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Stephan EllmannInstitute of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael UderInstitute of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Pascal A T BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. pascal.baltzer@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3755-5398
Medical University of Vienna · ATMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDue to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (bMRI) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The high number of detected lesions poses a significant logistic challenge in clinical practice. The aim was to evaluate a temporally and spatially resolved (4D) radiomics approach to distinguish benign from malignant enhancing breast lesions and thereby avoid unnecessary biopsies.

methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients with MRI-suspicious findings (BI-RADS 4/5). Two blinded readers analyzed DCE images using a commercially available software, automatically extracting BI-RADS curve types and pharmacokinetic enhancement features. After principal component analysis (PCA), a neural network-derived A.I. classifier to discriminate benign from malignant lesions was constructed and tested using a random split simple approach. The rate of avoidable biopsies was evaluated at exploratory cutoffs (C

resultsFour hundred seventy (295 malignant) lesions in 329 female patients (mean age 55.1 years, range 18-85 years) were examined. Eighty-six DCE features were extracted based on automated volumetric lesion analysis. Five independent component features were extracted using PCA. The A.I. classifier achieved a significant (p < .001) accuracy to distinguish benign from malignant lesion within the test sample (AUC: 83.5%; 95% CI: 76.8-89.0%). Applying identified cutoffs on testing data not included in training dataset showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions by 14.5% (C

conclusionThe investigated automated 4D radiomics approach resulted in an accurate A.I. classifier able to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Its application could have avoided unnecessary biopsies. KEY POINTS: • Principal component analysis of the extracted volumetric and temporally resolved (4D) DCE markers favored pharmacokinetic modeling derived features. • An A.I. classifier based on 86 extracted DCE features achieved a good to excellent diagnostic performance as measured by the area under the ROC curve with 80.6% (training dataset) and 83.5% (testing dataset). • Testing the resulting A.I. classifier showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign breast lesions by up to 36.2%, p < .001 at the cost of up to 4.5% (n = 4) false negative low-risk cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultContrast MediaBreast biopsiesBreast cancerBreast MRINeural networkPrincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID33744990
PMCPMC8270804
OpenAlexW3138919133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.