Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744987›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2021

Outcome of aortic stenosis according to invasive cardiac damage staging after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Jury Schewel, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Christian Frerker, Tobias Schmidt, Dimitry Schewel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Staging of Cardiac Damage for Aortic Stenosis: A Review.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jury SchewelDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany. jury.schewel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3621-2892
Karl-Heinz KuckDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian FrerkerDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias SchmidtDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dimitry SchewelDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent studies, a 5-stage cardiac damage classification in severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on echocardiographic parameters has shown to provide predictive value regarding clinical outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of a cardiac damage classification based on invasive hemodynamics in patients with AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

methodsA total of 1400 patients with symptomatic AS and full invasive hemodynamic assessment before TAVR were included. Patients were categorized according to their cardiac damage stage into five groups that are defined as: stage 0, no cardiac damage; stage 1, left ventricular damage; stage 2, left atrial and/or mitral valve damage; stage 3, pulmonary vasculature and/or tricuspid valve damage; stage 4, right ventricular damage.

results9.9% patients were classified as stage 0, 23.6% as stage 1, the majority of patients as stage 2 (33.5%), 23.1% as stage 3 and 10% as stage 4. One- and 4-year mortality were 10.1%/29.5% in stage 0, 16.1%/60.6% in stage 1, 17.3%/39.4% in stage 2, 22%/54.6% in stage 3, 27.1%/62.2% in stage 4 (p = 0.001/p < 0.001). The extent of cardiac damage was independently associated with increased mortality after TAVR (HR 1.16 per each increment in stage, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18; p = 0.018).

conclusionsCardiac damage staging in severe AS patients based on invasive hemodynamics appears to show strong association between the extent of cardiac damage and post-TAVR mortality. This staging classification provides predictive value and may improve risk stratification, therapy management and decision-making in patients with AS. Invasive Staging Classification of Cardiac Damage in Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis has an Impact on Outcome after TAVR. (Top) Invasive staging criteria for cardiac damage in five stages using left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) for stage 1 (red), post-capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) for stage 2 (green), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) for stage 3 (purple) and right atrial pressure (RAP) for stage 4 (yellow). The cake chart shows the distribution of the different stage in the whole cohort. (Bottom) Survival Analyses According to Stage of Cardiac Damage after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement using Invasive Criteria. Kaplan-Meier plots comparing overall (left) and cardiovascular (right) 4-year survival showing with the more advancing stage a higher mortality rate.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHeart DiseasesHemodynamicsHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic valve stenosisCardiac damageHemodynamicsTAVR

Identifiers

PMID33744987
OpenAlexW3136088264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.