ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2021
Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: an international consensus-based update of a quality measure.
Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06721715 (Textbook Outcomes After Oesophagectomy in a Regional Australian Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Textbook Outcomes After Oesophagectomy in a Regional Australian Hospital: a Retrospective Observational Cohort Study
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality Performance Indicators for the Surgical Management of Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.World journal of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Futility in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian origin undergoing or who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery: a multicenter retrospective observational study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Observational
- Open Versus Hybrid and Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Following Neoadjuvant FLOT Chemotherapy: An Australian and New Zealand Cohort Study.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Assessing Textbook Oncologic Outcomes in Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Textbook outcome can be reached in the learning curve for hybrid robot-assisted esophagectomy-experience from a German high-volume center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Survival Impact of Textbook Oncological Outcomes and SDHs for Patients with Operable Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Textbook outcomes in oesophageal resections from an evolving thoracic surgical unit.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- A standardized linear-stapled side-to-side anastomotic technique in robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective analysis of 350 consecutive cases from a prospective registry.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Quality of life and survival of achieving textbook outcome for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
- Induction Radiochemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes from a Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024Article
- Impact of operative time on textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy, a risk-adjusted analysis from a high-volume center.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Observational
- Safe and efficient 2-step implementation of totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Textbook Outcome after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Associated with Improved Overall and Disease-Free Survival.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Achieving a Textbook Outcome in Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- A call for patient-centred textbook outcomes for emergency surgery and trauma.The British journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery is a composite quality measure including 10 short-term surgical outcomes reflecting an uneventful perioperative course. Achieved textbook outcome is associated with improved long-term survival. This study aimed to update the original textbook outcome based on international consensus. Forty-five international expert esophageal cancer surgeons received a personal invitation to evaluate the 10 items in the original textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery and to rate 18 additional items divided over seven subcategories for their importance in the updated textbook outcome. Items were included in the updated textbook outcome if ≥80% of the respondents agreed on inclusion. In case multiple items within one subcategory reached ≥80% agreement, only the most inclusive item with the highest agreement rate was included. With a response rate of 80%, 36 expert esophageal cancer surgeons, from 34 hospitals, 16 countries, and 4 continents responded to this international survey. Based on the inclusion criteria, the updated quality indicator 'textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery' should consist of: tumor-negative resection margins, ≥20 lymph nodes retrieved and examined, no intraoperative complication, no complications Clavien-Dindo ≥III, no ICU/MCU readmission, no readmission related to the surgical procedure, no anastomotic leakage, no hospital stay ≥14 days, and no in-hospital mortality. This study resulted in an international consensus-based update of a quality measure, textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery. This updated textbook outcome should be implemented in quality assurance programs for centers performing esophageal cancer surgery, and could standardize quality measures used internationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.