Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744774›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of surgical research2021

Establishing Clinically Significant Patient-reported Outcomes for Diverticular Disease.

Sara Khor, David R Flum, Lisa L Strate, Mariam N Hantouli, Heather M Harris, Danielle C Lavallee, Brennan Mr Spiegel, Giana H Davidson

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of surgical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unmet social needs and diverticulitis: a phenotyping algorithm and cross-sectional analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. What's in a Number? Assessing the Burden of Diverticular Disease.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara KhorDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David R FlumDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lisa L StrateDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Mariam N HantouliDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Heather M HarrisDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Danielle C LavalleeDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Brennan Mr SpiegelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.
Giana H DavidsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: ghd@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHarborview Medical Center · US

Funding

Practice Patterns and Impact of Operative and Non-operative Management of DiverticulitisR01DK103915 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLUM, DAVID R · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiverticular disease can undermine health-related quality of life. The diverticulitis quality of life (DV-QOL) instrument was designed and validated to measure patient-reported burden of diverticular disease. However, values reflecting meaningful improvement (i.e., minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) have yet to be established. We sought to establish the MCID and PASS of the DV-QOL and describe the characteristics of those with DV-QOL above the PASS threshold. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of adults with diverticular disease from seven centers in Washington and California (2016-2018). Patients were surveyed at baseline, then quarterly up to 30 mo. To determine the MCID and PASS for DV-QOL, we applied various previously established distribution- and anchor-based approaches and compared the resulting values.

resultsThe study included 177 patients (mean age 57 y, 43% women). A PASS threshold of 3.2/10 distinguished between those with and without health-related quality of life-impacting diverticulitis with acceptable accuracy (area under the curve 0.76). A change of 2.2 points in the DV-QOL was the most appropriate MCID: above the distribution-based MCIDs and corresponding to patient perception of importance of change (AUC 0.70). Patients with DV-QOL ≥ PASS were more often men, younger, had Medicaid, had more serious episodes of diverticulitis, and had an occupational degree or high-school education or less.

conclusionsOur study is the first to define MCID and PASS for DV-QOL. These thresholds are critical for measuring the impact of diverticular disease and the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedColectomyDiverticulitis, ColonicElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferencePractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesDiverticulitis quality of lifeHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL)Minimal clinically important difference (MCID)Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS)Patient-reported outcomesSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD)

Identifiers

PMID33744774
PMCPMC9011199
OpenAlexW3138595672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.