Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744718›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2021

STK11 alterations in the pan-cancer setting: prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Nithya Krishnamurthy, Aaron M Goodman, Donald A Barkauskas, Razelle Kurzrock

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cancers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Precision immune regulation in KRAS-mutated cancers: the final piece of the puzzle?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nithya KrishnamurthyCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. Electronic address: Nithya.krishnamurthy@yale.edu.
Aaron M GoodmanCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Donald A BarkauskasBiostatistics Division, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Razelle KurzrockCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Southern California · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSTK11 is an important tumour suppressor gene reported to confer immunotherapy resistance in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) especially in the presence of KRAS co-alterations.

methodsThis study analysed 4446 patients for whom next-generation sequencing of tissue and/or circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) had been performed.

resultsOverall, 60 of 4446 tumours (1.35%) harboured STK11 alterations. STK11 alterations were associated with shorter median time to progression and overall survival (OS) across cancers from diagnosis: 6.4 months (5.1-7.9) versus 12 months (11.7-12.3; p = 0.001); and 20.5 (17.4-23.5) versus 29.1 (26.9-31.3; p = 0.03), respectively (pan-cancer). Pan-cancers, the median progression-free survival (PFS; 95% CI) for first-line therapy (regardless of treatment type) for those with co-altered STK11 and KRAS (N = 27; versus STK11-altered and KRAS wild type [N = 33]), was significantly shorter (3 [1.3-4.7] versus 10 [4.9-15.7] months, p < 0.0005, p multivariate, 0.06); the median OS also was also shorter (p multivariate = 0.02). In pan-cancer patients treated with checkpoint blockade, STK11 and KRAS co-altered versus STK11-altered/KRAS wild type had a shorter median PFS and trend toward shorter OS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.06, respectively). In contrast, in examining STK11-altered versus wild-type pan-cancer patients treated with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, the two groups showed no difference in outcome (PFS [p = 0.4]; OS [p = 0.7]); STK11-altered versus wild-type lung cancer patients also did not fare worse on immunotherapy.

conclusionsAcross cancers, STK11 alterations correlated with a poor prognosis regardless of therapy. However, STK11 alterations alone did not associate with inferior immunotherapy outcome in the pan-cancer setting or in NSCLC. Pan-cancer patients with co-altered STK11/KRAS did worse, regardless of treatment type.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesCirculating Tumor DNAProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTK11 protein, humanCancerImmunotherapyKRASNon–small cell lung cancerSTK11

Identifiers

PMID33744718
PMCPMC10344467
OpenAlexW3138352035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.