Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744456›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Enhancing vs. inhibiting semantic performance with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the anterior temporal lobe: Frequency- and task-specific effects.

JeYoung Jung, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Concept Cells and the Neural Bases of Human Memory.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of the Anterior Temporal Lobe in Reading: An HD-tDCS Study.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Approaches to the Surgery of Brain Gliomas.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

JeYoung JungSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: jeyoung.jung@nottingham.ac.uk.
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Science Unit (CBU), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK. Electronic address: matt.lambon-ralph@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/18Medical Research Council MR/R023883/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating, converging evidence indicates that the anterior temporal lobe (ATL) appears to be the transmodal hub for semantic representation. A series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) investigations utilizing the 'virtual lesion' approach have established the brain-behavioural relationship between the ATL and semantic processing by demonstrating that inhibitory rTMS over the ATL induced impairments in semantic performance in healthy individuals. However, a growing body of rTMS studies suggest that rTMS might also be a tool for cognitive enhancement and rehabilitation, though there has been no previous exploration in semantic cognition. Here, we explored a potential role of rTMS in enhancing and inhibiting semantic performance with contrastive rTMS protocols (1 Hz vs. 20 Hz) by controlling practice effects. Twenty-one healthy participants were recruited and performed an object category judgement task and a pattern matching task serving as a control task before and after the stimulation over the ATL (1 Hz, 20 Hz, and sham). A task familiarization procedure was performed prior to the experiment in order to establish a 'stable baseline' prior to stimulation and thus minimize practice effect. Our results demonstrated that it is possible to modulate semantic performance positively or negatively depending on the ATL stimulation frequency: 20 Hz rTMS was optimal for facilitating cortical processing (faster RT in a semantic task) contrasting with diminished semantic performance after 1 Hz rTMS. In addition to cementing the importance of the ATL to semantic representation, our findings suggest that 20 Hz rTMS leads to semantic enhancement in healthy individuals and potentially could be used for patients with semantic impairments as a therapeutic tool.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceTemporal LobeTime FactorsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultAnterior temporal lobeNeuroplasticityRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSemantic enhancementSemantic representation

Identifiers

PMID33744456
PMCPMC8204263
OpenAlexW3137135815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.