Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744294›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry

Integrating 3D structural information into systems biology.

Diana Murray, Donald Petrey, Barry Honig

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Turing, von Neumann, and the computational architecture of biological machines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Emerging maps of allosteric regulation in cellular networks.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  5. Docking-based long timescale simulation of cell-size protein systems at atomic resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana MurrayDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Donald PetreyDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Barry HonigDepartment of Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Department of Medicine, Zuckerman Mind Brain and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: bh6@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Systematic pharmacological targeting of the core mechanisms responsible for maintaining cancer cell stateU54CA209997 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA, HONIG, BARRY H · 2016 to 2021
$10.9M
COMPUTER STUDIES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01GM030518 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 1985 to 2020
$4.5M
Genome-wide structure-based analysis of protein-protein interactions and networksR35GM139585 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BARRY H HONIG · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209997NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030518NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems biology is a data-heavy field that focuses on systems-wide depictions of biological phenomena necessarily sacrificing a detailed characterization of individual components. As an example, genome-wide protein interaction networks are widely used in systems biology and continuously extended and refined as new sources of evidence become available. Despite the vast amount of information about individual protein structures and protein complexes that has accumulated in the past 50 years in the Protein Data Bank, the data, computational tools, and language of structural biology are not an integral part of systems biology. However, increasing effort has been devoted to this integration, and the related literature is reviewed here. Relationships between proteins that are detected via structural similarity offer a rich source of information not available from sequence similarity, and homology modeling can be used to leverage Protein Data Bank structures to produce 3D models for a significant fraction of many proteomes. A number of structure-informed genomic and cross-species (i.e., virus-host) interactomes will be described, and the unique information they provide will be illustrated with a number of examples. Tissue- and tumor-specific interactomes have also been developed through computational strategies that exploit patient information and through genetic interactions available from increasingly sensitive screens. Strategies to integrate structural information with these alternate data sources will be described. Finally, efforts to link protein structure space with chemical compound space offer novel sources of information in drug design, off-target identification, and the identification of targets for compounds found to be effective in phenotypic screens.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinSystems BiologyProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MapsProteinsProteinscomputational biologyhomology modelingprotein–protein interactionprotein structuresystems biology

Identifiers

PMID33744294
PMCPMC8095114
OpenAlexW3138855639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.