Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33744287›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry

Evolution of standardization and dissemination of cryo-EM structures and data jointly by the community, PDB, and EMDB.

Wah Chiu, Michael F Schmid, Grigore D Pintilie, Catherine L Lawson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Validation of helical symmetry parameters in the EMDB.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Complex Portal 2022: new curation frontiers.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wah ChiuDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Division of CryoEM and Bioimaging, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California, USA. Electronic address: wahc@stanford.edu.
Michael F SchmidDivision of CryoEM and Bioimaging, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Grigore D PintilieDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Catherine L LawsonInstitute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Unified Data Resource for Large Complexes Determined by Cryo-Electron MicroscopyR01GM079429 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2007 to 2021
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) methods began to be used in the mid-1970s to study thin and periodic arrays of proteins. Following a half-century of development in cryo-specimen preparation, instrumentation, data collection, data processing, and modeling software, cryo-EM has become a routine method for solving structures from large biological assemblies to small biomolecules at near to true atomic resolution. This review explores the critical roles played by the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) in partnership with the community to develop the necessary infrastructure to archive cryo-EM maps and associated models. Public access to cryo-EM structure data has in turn facilitated better understanding of structure-function relationships and advancement of image processing and modeling tool development. The partnership between the global cryo-EM community and PDB and EMDB leadership has synergistically shaped the standards for metadata, one-stop deposition of maps and models, and validation metrics to assess the quality of cryo-EM structures. The advent of cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) for in situ molecular cell structures at a broad resolution range and their correlations with other imaging data introduce new data archival challenges in terms of data size and complexity in the years to come.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayProtein ConformationProteinsProteinscryo-electron microscopycryo-electron tomographydata archivingelectron crystallographyimagingprotein structuresingle particle analysis

Identifiers

PMID33744287
PMCPMC8050867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.