ArticleJournal of emergency nursing2021
United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics.
Article in Journal of emergency nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silent Trauma: Implications of Non-Fatal Strangulation-Acquired Brain Injury - An Integrative Review.Neuropsychology review · 2026Review
- Partner-Inflicted Brain Injury: Intentional, Concurrent, and Repeated Traumatic and Hypoxic Neurologic Insults.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Anoxic Brain Injury: A Subtle and Often Overlooked Finding in Non-Fatal Intimate Partner Strangulation.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Assault-related anoxia and neck injuries in US emergency departments.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024Article
- Screening for Brain Injury Sustained in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV): Measure Development and Preliminary Utility of the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire IPV Module.Journal of neurotrauma · 2023Article
- Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Article
- "It Was Scary, But Then It Was Kind of Exciting": Young Women's Experiences with Choking During Sex.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNonfatal intimate partner strangulation poses significant acute and long-term morbidity risks and also heightens women's risk for future femicide. The lifetime prevalence of nonfatal intimate partner strangulation has been estimated to be approximately 10%, or 11 million women, in the general United States population. Given the potential for significant health risks and serious consequences of strangulation, this study adds to the limited literature by estimating prevalence and describing the associated characteristics of strangulation-related visits among United States ED visits by adult women after intimate partner violence.
methodsPrevalence estimation as well as simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were completed using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample spanning the years 2006 to 2014.
resultsThe prevalence of strangulation codes was estimated at 1.2% of all intimate partner violence visits. Adjusting for visits, hospital characteristics, and visit year, higher odds of strangulation were noted in younger women, metropolitan hospitals, level I/II trauma centers, and non-Northeast regions. Increases in strangulation events among intimate partner violence-related visits in recent years were also observed. DISCUSSION: A relatively low prevalence may reflect an underestimate of true nonfatal intimate partner strangulation visits owing to coding or a very low rate of ED visits for this issue. Higher odds of strangulation among intimate partner violence visits by women in more recent years may be due to increased recognition and documentation by frontline clinicians and coding teams. Continued research is needed to further inform clinical, postcare, and social policy efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.