Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743793›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

The need for widely available genomic testing in rare eye diseases: an ERN-EYE position statement.

Graeme C Black, Panagiotis Sergouniotis, Andrea Sodi, Bart P Leroy, Caroline Van Cauwenbergh, Petra Liskova, Karen Grønskov, Artur Klett, Susanne Kohl, Gita Taurina and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 13 countries.

Graeme C Black *Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital and Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Panagiotis Sergouniotis *Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital and Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Andrea Sodi *Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Bart P LeroyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Caroline Van CauwenberghDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Petra LiskovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karen GrønskovRigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Artur KlettEast Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
Susanne KohlInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gita TaurinaChildren's Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Marius SukysHospital of Lithuanian, University of Health Science, Kauno Klinikos, Lithuania.
Lonneke Haer-WigmanDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Katarzyna NowomiejskaDepartment of General Ophthalmology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland.
João Pedro MarquesCentro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Dorothée LerouxERN-EYE Coordination Center, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. dorothee.leroux@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-6611
Frans P M CremersDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Elfride De BaereCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hélène DollfusERN-EYE Coordination Center, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
ERN-EYE study group
Ghent University Hospital · BEManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLChildren's Clinical University Hospital · LVMedical University of Lublin · PLRigshospitalet · DKChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USEast Tallinn Central Hospital · EEHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare Eye Diseases (RED) are the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness for children and young adults in Europe. This heterogeneous group of conditions includes over 900 disorders ranging from relatively prevalent disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa to very rare entities such as developmental eye anomalies. A significant number of patients with RED have an underlying genetic etiology. One of the aims of the European Reference Network for Rare Eye Diseases (ERN-EYE) is to facilitate improvement in diagnosis of RED in European member states. MAIN BODY: Technological advances have allowed genetic and genomic testing for RED. The outcome of genetic testing allows better understanding of the condition and allows reproductive and therapeutic options. The increase of the number of clinical trials for RED has provided urgency for genetic testing in RED. A survey of countries participating in ERN-EYE demonstrated that the majority are able to access some forms of genomic testing. However, there is significant variability, particularly regarding testing as part of clinical service. Some countries have a well-delineated rare disease pathway and have a national plan for rare diseases combined or not with a national plan for genomics in medicine. In other countries, there is a well-established organization of genetic centres that offer reimbursed genomic testing of RED and other rare diseases. Clinicians often rely upon research-funded laboratories or private companies. Notably, some member states rely on cross-border testing by way of an academic research project. Consequently, many clinicians are either unable to access testing or are confronted with long turnaround times. Overall, while the cost of sequencing has dropped, the cumulative cost of a genomic testing service for populations remains considerable. Importantly, the majority of countries reported healthcare budgets that limit testing. SHORT

conclusionDespite technological advances, critical gaps in genomic testing remain in Europe, especially in smaller countries where no formal genomic testing pathways exist. Even within larger countries, the existing arrangements are insufficient to meet the demand and to ensure access. ERN-EYE promotes access to genetic testing in RED and emphasizes the clinical need and relevance of genetic testing in RED.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesRare DiseasesChildEuropeGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansERN-EYEGenetic and genomic testingPosition statementRare eye diseases

Identifiers

PMID33743793
PMCPMC7980559
OpenAlexW3138423443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.