Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743709›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Putting patients first: development of a patient advocate and general practitioner-informed model of patient-centred care.

Bryce Brickley, Lauren T Williams, Mark Morgan, Alyson Ross, Kellie Trigger, Lauren Ball

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment measures for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy among pediatric oncology patients: an updated systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bryce BrickleyMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. bryce.brickley@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7093-7793
Lauren T WilliamsMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Mark MorganBond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Alyson RossGold Coast Primary Health Network, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Kellie TriggerGold Coast Primary Health Network, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Lauren BallMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Griffith University · AUGold Coast Health · AUBond University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients, providers and health care organisations benefit from an increased understanding and implementation of patient-centred care (PCC) by general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to evaluate and advance a theoretical model of PCC developed in consultation with practising GPs and patient advocates.

methodsQualitative description in a social constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Participants were purposively sampled from six primary care organisations in south east Queensland/northern New South Wales, Australia. Participants engaged in focus group discussions where they expressed their perceptions, views and feelings of an existing PCC model. Data was analysed thematically using a constant-comparison approach.

resultsThree focus groups with 15 patient advocates and three focus groups with 12 GPs were conducted before thematic saturation was obtained. Three themes emerged: i) the model represents the ideal, ii) considering the system and collaborating in care and iii) optimising the general practice environment. The themes related to participants' impression of the model and new components of PCC perceived to be experienced in the 'real world'. The data was synthesised to produce an advanced model of PCC named, "Putting Patients First: A Map for PCC".

conclusionsOur revised PCC model represents an enhanced understanding of PCC in the 'real world' and can be used to inform patients, providers and health organisations striving for PCC. Qualitative testing advanced and supported the credibility of the model and expanded its application beyond the doctor-patient encounter. Future work could incorporate our map for PCC in tool/tool kits designed to support GPs and general practice with PCC.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaHumansNew South WalesPatient AdvocacyQualitative ResearchQueenslandGeneral practiceGeneral practitionersPatient-centred carePrimary health careQualitative descriptionQualitySafety

Identifiers

PMID33743709
PMCPMC7981870
OpenAlexW3137069089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.