Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743693›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

What matters to patients? A mixed method study of the importance and consideration of oncology patient demands.

Mathias Waelli, Etienne Minvielle, Maria Ximena Acero, Khouloud Ba, Benoit Lalloué

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. "Life Without Symptoms" or "Being Able to Enjoy Life": What does it Mean to be "Well" After Cancer?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias WaelliEA MOS 7348, EHESP, French School of Public Health, 15 Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043, Rennes, France. mathias.waelli@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8883-4004
Etienne Minviellei3-CRG Ecole Polytechnique, Route de Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Maria Ximena AceroEA MOS 7348, EHESP, French School of Public Health, 15 Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043, Rennes, France.
Khouloud BaAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 3 Avenue Victoria, 75004, Paris, France.
Benoit LallouéBIGS Université de Lorraine CNRS INRIA IECL F54000, 615 Rue du Jardin-Botanique, 54600, Villers-lès-Nancy, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRÉcole Polytechnique · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA patient-centred approach is increasingly the mandate for healthcare delivery, especially with the growing emergence of chronic conditions. A relevant but often overlooked obstacle to delivering person-centred care is the identification and consideration of all demands based on individual experience, not only disease-based requirements. Mindful of this approach, there is a need to explore how patient demands are expressed and considered in healthcare delivery systems. This study aims to: (i) understand how different types of demands expressed by patients are taken into account in the current delivery systems operated by Health Care Organisations (HCOs); (ii) explore the often overlooked content of specific non-clinical demands (i.e. demands related to interactions between disease treatments and everyday life).

methodWe adopted a mixed method in two cancer centres, representing exemplary cases of organisational transformation: (i) circulation of a questionnaire to assess the importance that breast cancer patients attach to every clinical (C) and non-clinical (NC) demand identified in an exploratory inquiry, and the extent to which each demand has been taken into account based on individual experiences; (ii) a qualitative analysis based on semi-structured interviews exploring the content of specific NC demands.

resultsFurther to the way in which the questionnaires were answered (573 answers/680 questionnaires printed) and the semi-structured interviews (36) with cancer patients, results show that NC demands are deemed by patients to be almost as important as C demands (C = 6.53/7 VS. NC = 6.13), but are perceived to be considered to a lesser extent in terms of pathway management (NC = 4.02 VS C = 5.65), with a significant variation depending on the type of non-clinical demands expressed. Five types of NC demands can be identified: demands relating to daily life, alternative medicine, structure of the treatment pathway, administrative and logistic assistance and demands relating to new technologies.

conclusionsThis study shows that HCOs should be able to consider non-clinical demands in addition to those referring to clinical needs. These demands require revision of the healthcare professionals' mandate and transition from a supply-orientated system towards a demand-driven approach throughout the care pathway. Other sectors have developed hospitality management, mass customisation and personalisation to scale up approaches that could serve as inspiring examples.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResearch DesignDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCare customisationOncologyOrganisationPatient-centred carePatient demands

Identifiers

PMID33743693
PMCPMC7981812
OpenAlexW3123968880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.