Trial reportBMC health services research2021
Multi-level considerations for optimal implementation of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy to treat people living with HIV: perspectives of health care providers participating in phase 3 trials.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir Compared With Lenacapavir for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Acting Cabotegravir Injections Are More Acceptable Than Long-Acting Lenacapavir Injections After One Dose: Results From the CLARITY Randomized Crossover Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Early Experience and Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in a South Side Chicago HIV Clinic.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Long-Acting: Overview of Injection Guidance, Injection Site Reactions, and Best Practices for Intramuscular Injection Administration.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Trial
- Improving Adherence to the Target Window for Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Long-Acting Injections Through the CHORUS™ App and Web Portal: A Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareTrial
- What Do People with HIV Want to Know About Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine?AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Accelerating Low-Barrier Use of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy to Maximize Impact in People with HIV and Viremia or Adherence Challenges.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2026Review
- Determinants of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine discontinuation in real-world HIV care: insights from the relativity cohort.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- Exploring provider preferences in the design of HIV treatment packages integrating long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy in New York Ryan White Part A medical case management programs: A discrete choice experiment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Campus healthcare workers' knowledge and views on injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis prior to rollout in South Africa: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Eligibility and factors associated with long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine initiation in an urban academic HIV clinic.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Ethical issues surrounding the implementation of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa.International health · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives of Participants Who Received Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine at Home or in Clinic.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2025Article
- Strategies for implementing long-acting cabotegravir for PrEP in US clinics serving Black women: interim healthcare provider findings from the EBONI study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Perspectives of People With HIV on Implementing Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine in Clinics and Community Settings in the United Kingdom: Results From the Antisexist, Antiracist, Antiageist Implementing Long-acting Novel Antiretrovirals Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Observational
- Perspectives of Primary Healthcare Workers on HIV Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): A Scoping Review Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Generating Evidence for Effective HIV Implementation at Scale: The Value and Feasibility of a Network for Implementation Science in HIV.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LA ART) has been shown to be non-inferior to daily oral ART, with high patient satisfaction and preference to oral standard of care in research to date, and has recently been approved for use in the United States and Europe. This study examined the perspectives of health care providers participating in LA ART clinical trials on potential barriers and solutions to LA ART roll-out into real world settings.
methodsThis analysis draws on two data sources: (1) open-ended questions embedded in a structured online survey of 329 health care providers participating in the ATLAS-2 M trial across 13 countries; and (2) in-depth interviews with 14 providers participating in FLAIR/ ATLAS/ATLAS-2 M trials in the United States and Spain. Both assessments explored provider views and clinic dynamics related to the introduction of LA ART and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was drawn on as the conceptual framework underpinning development of a model depicting study findings.
resultsBarriers and proposed solutions to LA ART implementation were identified at the individual, clinic and health system levels. Provider perceptions of patient level barriers included challenges with adhering to frequent injection appointments and injection tolerability. Proposed solutions included patient education, having designated staff for clinic visit retention, and clinic flexibility with appointment scheduling. The main provider concern was identifying appropriate candidates for LA ART; proposed solutions focused on patient provider communication and decision making. Clinic level barriers included the need for additional skilled individuals to administer injections, shifts in workflow as demand increases and the logistics of cold-chain storage. Proposed solutions included staff hiring and training, strategic planning around workflow and logistics, and the possibility of offering injections in other settings, including the home. Health system level barriers included cost and approvals from national regulatory bodies. Potential solutions included governments subsidizing treatment, ensuring cost is competitive with oral ART, and offering co-pay assistance.
conclusionsResults suggest the importance of multi-level support systems to optimize patient-provider communication and treatment decision-making; clinic staffing, workflow, logistics protocols and infrastructure; and cost-related factors within a given health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.