Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743684›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

Multi-level considerations for optimal implementation of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy to treat people living with HIV: perspectives of health care providers participating in phase 3 trials.

Andrea Mantsios, Miranda Murray, Tahilin S Karver, Wendy Davis, Noya Galai, Princy Kumar, Susan Swindells, U Fritz Bredeek, Rafael Rubio García, Antonio Antela and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea MantsiosPublic Health Innovation & Action, New York, NY, USA. amantsios@phiaconsulting.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-9173
Miranda MurrayViiV Global Health Outcomes, London, England, UK.
Tahilin S KarverJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Wendy DavisGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Noya GalaiJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Princy KumarGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Susan SwindellsUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
U Fritz BredeekMetropolis Medical, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rafael Rubio GarcíaHospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio AntelaHospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Santiago Cenoz GomisViiV Healthcare, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Pascual BernáldezGSK, Madrid, Spain.
Maggie CzarnogorskiViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Krischan HudsonViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Nicki WaltersViiV Healthcare, London, UK.
Deanna KerriganGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · USJohns Hopkins University · USTriangle · USViiV Healthcare (United Kingdom) · GBAction Network · USComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESGeorgetown University · USGlaxoSmithKline (Spain) · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USViiV Healthcare (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LA ART) has been shown to be non-inferior to daily oral ART, with high patient satisfaction and preference to oral standard of care in research to date, and has recently been approved for use in the United States and Europe. This study examined the perspectives of health care providers participating in LA ART clinical trials on potential barriers and solutions to LA ART roll-out into real world settings.

methodsThis analysis draws on two data sources: (1) open-ended questions embedded in a structured online survey of 329 health care providers participating in the ATLAS-2 M trial across 13 countries; and (2) in-depth interviews with 14 providers participating in FLAIR/ ATLAS/ATLAS-2 M trials in the United States and Spain. Both assessments explored provider views and clinic dynamics related to the introduction of LA ART and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was drawn on as the conceptual framework underpinning development of a model depicting study findings.

resultsBarriers and proposed solutions to LA ART implementation were identified at the individual, clinic and health system levels. Provider perceptions of patient level barriers included challenges with adhering to frequent injection appointments and injection tolerability. Proposed solutions included patient education, having designated staff for clinic visit retention, and clinic flexibility with appointment scheduling. The main provider concern was identifying appropriate candidates for LA ART; proposed solutions focused on patient provider communication and decision making. Clinic level barriers included the need for additional skilled individuals to administer injections, shifts in workflow as demand increases and the logistics of cold-chain storage. Proposed solutions included staff hiring and training, strategic planning around workflow and logistics, and the possibility of offering injections in other settings, including the home. Health system level barriers included cost and approvals from national regulatory bodies. Potential solutions included governments subsidizing treatment, ensuring cost is competitive with oral ART, and offering co-pay assistance.

conclusionsResults suggest the importance of multi-level support systems to optimize patient-provider communication and treatment decision-making; clinic staffing, workflow, logistics protocols and infrastructure; and cost-related factors within a given health system.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAnti-Retroviral AgentsEuropeHealth PersonnelHumansSpainAnti-Retroviral AgentsARTClinical settingsHealth care providersHIVImplementationLong-acting injectable

Identifiers

PMID33743684
PMCPMC7980753
OpenAlexW3136625448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.