Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743641›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

"Strong Teeth": the acceptability of an early-phase feasibility trial of an oral health intervention delivered by dental teams to parents of young children.

Amrit Bhatti, Kara A Gray-Burrows, Erin Giles, Lucy Rutter, Jayne Purdy, Tim Zoltie, Robert M West, Sue Pavitt, Zoe Marshman, Peter F Day

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amrit BhattiSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. a.bhatti@leeds.ac.uk.
Kara A Gray-BurrowsSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-5066
Erin GilesSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Lucy RutterSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Jayne PurdySchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Tim ZoltieSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Robert M WestSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7305-3654
Sue PavittSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Zoe MarshmanUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-9637
Peter F DaySchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9711-9638

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental caries (tooth decay) in children is a worldwide public health problem. The leading cause of caries is poor oral hygiene behaviours and the frequent consumption of sugary foods and drinks. Changing oral health habits requires effective behaviour change conversations. The dental practice provides an opportunity for dental teams to explore with parents the oral health behaviours they undertake for their young children (0-5 years old). However, evidence suggests that dental teams need further support, training and resources. Therefore, "Strong Teeth" (an oral health intervention) was co-developed to help dental teams undertake these behaviour change conversations. The current paper will explore the acceptability of the "Strong Teeth" intervention with dental teams and parents of children aged 0-5 years old using multiple datasets (interviews, focus groups and dental team member diaries)

methodsFollowing the delivery of the "Strong Teeth" intervention, qualitative interviews with parents and focus groups with dental team members were undertaken. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a theoretical framework of acceptability. The self-reported dental team diaries supplemented the interviews and focus groups and were analysed using framework analysis.

resultsFour themes were developed: (1) integration within the dental practice; (2) incorporating the Oral-B electric toothbrush; (3) facilitating discussions and demonstrations; and (4) the practicality of the Disney Magic Timer app. Overall, the "Strong Teeth" intervention was acceptable to parents and dental teams. Parents felt the Oral-B electric toothbrush was a good motivator; however, the Disney Magic Timer app received mixed feedback on how well it could be used effectively in the home setting. Findings suggest that the intervention was more acceptable as a "whole team approach" when all members of the dental practice willingly participated.

conclusionsThere are limited studies that use a robust process evaluation to measure the acceptability of an intervention. The use of the theoretical framework of acceptability helped identify aspects of the intervention that were positive and helped identify the interventions areas for enhancement moving forwards. Future modifications include enhanced whole team approach training to optimise acceptability to all those involved.

trial registrationISRCTN Register, (ISRCTN10709150).

Indexed as

Dental CariesOral HealthChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsToothbrushingBehaviour changeCariesPaediatricParentsPreventionTraining

Identifiers

PMID33743641
PMCPMC7980542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.