Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743592›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2021

Systematic review: the bioavailability of orally administered antibiotics during the initial phase of a systemic infection in non-ICU patients.

Annemieke K van den Broek, Jan M Prins, Caroline E Visser, Reinier M van Hest

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annemieke K van den BroekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.k.vandenbroek@amsterdamumc.nl.
Jan M PrinsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline E VisserDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinier M van HestDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe systemic response to an infection might influence the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. To evaluate the desired possibility of an earlier (< 24 h) IV-to-oral switch therapy in febrile non-ICU, hospitalized patients, a systematic review was performed to assess the effect of the initial phase of a systemic infection on the bioavailability of orally administered antibiotics in such patients.

methodsAn electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase up to July 2020. Studies were selected when outcome data were collected during the initial stage of a febrile disease. Outcome data were (maximum) serum concentrations, time of achieving maximum serum concentration, and the area-under-the-plasma-concentration-time curve or bioavailability of orally administered antibiotics. Risk of bias was assessed.

resultsWe identified 9 studies on 6 antibiotics. Ciprofloxacin was the most frequently studied drug. Outcomes of the studies were heterogeneous and generally had a high risk of bias. Three small studies, two on ciprofloxacin and one on clarithromycin, compared the pharmacokinetics of febrile patients with those of clinically recovered patients and suggested that bioavailability was not altered in these patients. Other studies either compared the pharmacokinetics in febrile patients with reported pharmacokinetic values from earlier studies in healthy volunteers (n = 2), or provided no comparison at all and were non-conclusive (n = 4).

conclusionThere is a clear knowledge gap regarding the bioavailability of orally administered antibiotics in non-ICU patients during the initial phase of a systemic infection. Well-designed studies on this topic are necessary to elucidate whether patients can benefit from the advantages of an earlier IV-to-oral switch.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AvailabilityCiprofloxacinFeverHumansInfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinAcute infectionBioavailabilityNon-ICU patientsOral antibioticsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID33743592
PMCPMC7981967
OpenAlexW3137807654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.